The picture provided from Katie Stack's website, in her "Bio" section.

Al Jazeera’s “The Stream”: Katie Stack doesn’t seem to understand abortion issue

Last month, Lila Rose appeared on Al Jazeera‘s program “The Stream” to discuss the implications of Roe v. Wade 40 years later. Lila eloquently defended the pro-life position against several pro-abortion advocates, three of whom admitted to having had abortions themselves.

One such pro-abortion advocate is Katie Stack. Katie is on the show as an “abortion clinic patient advocate.” After being asked to categorize the debate, she says she believes that the issue is absolutely polarized, but that it’s because of the anti-abortion movement wanting to make abortion illegal. Katie believes that when the movement says that abortion is murder, or a genocide, or a holocaust, it makes it hard to have a discussion. Well, such terms are being used because that’s how you accurately describe abortion. If it’s hard to have a discussion then, it’s because people don’t want to see abortion for what it truthfully is.

Lisa has this to ask: “[S]tates have been successful in passing laws that limit abortions, requiring parental notification, requiring a 24- to 72-hour waiting period. Why do you think states are having success with, um, these restrictions? Does it signal that people’s sensibilities are changing, as Lila’s talking about here?”

Katie’s answer shows that she doesn’t believe that sensibilities are changing at all; rather, she blames it all on “party politics”:

Um, I would say not necessarily. I think you definitely have to look at how party politics and the party system in our country works. Um, out of those restrictions that are being passed in, um, states that have majority Republican congressmen and, um, legislatures, so, definitely an aspect, you know, to that. But I do think that Americans overwhelmingly don’t understand how difficult it can be to get an abortion. So something like a 24-hour wait period sounds like a good idea, until you’re realizing that women have to find daycare for their children, they have to miss wages from missing work, they have to travel, sometimes across state lines, even, to be able to get to a clinic. The restrictions sound like a good idea in theory, until you apply them to the reality of the women’s lives, and you see that it just makes abortion inaccessible.

First of all, Katie brushes off “changing sensibilities” on Republicans passing anti-abortion laws. Her response as to why such restrictions may not work sounds typical coming from a pro-abortion advocate. However, it is she who doesn’t understand how such “restrictions” can help women have more time to make an informed decision before they go through with such an irreversible choice.

Ten minutes into the program, clips are shown of the March for Life, including those at the event who were interviewed. One woman speaks as to how her mother was raped but had her baby anyway. The woman interviewed was that baby and is alive today to tell that story. Lisa asks Katie if hearing that story makes her question abortion in any way – if it “had the potential to change the dialogue at all[.] … [D]oes it change the way you approach it at all?”

To an extent. I think – I mean, again, though, unfortunately a lot of the comments we’ve heard so far are about the fetus, and pregnancy is not without consequence for women. I mean, being pregnant for nine months, giving birth, you know, that, that is not something you can just do lightly. It’s something that requires medical attention; it’s something that can be very problematic and difficult, so whenever I hear stories like that, I always bring the, the – my thought always goes back to the woman in that position. And so while, you know, certainly we don’t want, um – I wouldn’t say that in retroactively I would want anyone to be killed by abortion, at the same time, my heart goes out to her mother and what her mother was experiencing. And if her mother felt that the best thing to do in that situation was to end the pregnancy, then absolutely she should have – she should have had that right.

Katie outright mentions somebody being “killed by abortion,” yet she bypasses the humanity of the situation completely, as she continues to support abortion no matter what.

After a powerful statement from Lila, Katie feels the need to turn to falsehoods in order to make her case. At around 28 minutes into the program, she mentions the number of women dying from abortion complications before Roe v. Wade and asks, “How on earth is that pro-life?” As we know, however, Dr. Bernard Nathanson, who made up those numbers, admitted that those deaths were grossly overreported. He did so in order to do what Katie herself may well be doing with her statements: scare the public into believing that women will die without legal abortion. And as we also know, women die from legal abortion as well. We also have a lot more pro-life resources out there to help women with their options and inform them of available medical care.

What seems like the most climactic moment of the segment is towards the end. According to Katie, women will not stop having abortions. One has to wonder, then: why not? Is abortion the only option that Katie is selling or advocating for women? Katie completely denies that women are being tricked by Planned Parenthood, and that they have abortions because they fundamentally want to have them. Katie must not have really encountered women thinking of abortion, who are vulnerable and scared. She must have no idea that 64 percent of abortions involve some sort of coercion. Perhaps Katie cares more about abortion than about the women themselves.

And then, at the conclusion of her rant, Kate admits that she herself has had an abortion.

I mean, like I said before, women are not going to stop having abortions. And it’s not that they’re being tricked by Planned Parenthood, or any other organization to have an abortion; it’s because they fundamentally want one. I’m a white, middle-class woman; I was well educated; I had every resource available to me to raise a child, should I want to, but I chose to have an abortion, because I fundamentally did not want to be pregnant and give birth. So, I mean, we can have – I think we need to have discussions about how we can make there be actual choice, so women don’t feel like they have to have an abortion because they don’t have access to other things. But that’s not going to get rid of abortion.

In Katie’s answer lies the sadness and the selfishness of abortion. Her choice to have an abortion caused the death of an innocent unborn life with great potential. A baby girl or boy paid the price of death because Katie didn’t want to have her or him. If Katie sticks to her fundamental mantra that women are going to have abortions, no matter what, even with “every resource available,” then what is the middle ground here?

People like Katie are always going to want to have abortions available – no matter what, it seems, and no matter the cost. Can we even dream of reaching a middle ground? Until people like Katie see abortion for what it really is, it seems doubtful. And it won’t be the fault of the pro-life movement.

  • JivinJ

    Katie Stack’s first public appearance talking about her abortion was on MTV’s No Easy Decision special. In that special she talked about her abortion and started crying when she talked about going to a hotel after her abortion to avoid seeing her sister’s baby. The last few years working as an abortion advocate appear to have somewhat hardened her. But she has been tweeting about the irresponsibility of abortion advocates demonizing ultrasounds.

    • Rebecca Downs

      Thank you for your comment and insight! I would definitely agree that she has been hardened and while sad, unfortunately that’s the face she is showing off to the public right now. It does further make me believe that she does and will regret this and it’s going to hit her hard when it does. Let’s pray she finds the love and respect she needs and deserves when she is ready for that. And that is right of her to demonize ultrasounds, and actually surprising. Again, this is going off how she presented herself on “The Stream,” after which she demonized waiting periods…

  • http://www.facebook.com/Linda.Morris.Bollengier Linda Lee Morris Bollengier

    I do not know who this Katie Stack is but she is one of the most unprofessional and – well – ignorant speakers I have ever seen or heard!!

    These people keep talking about rights – they just do not get it, THE BABY is A PERSON – THE BABY HAS RIGHTS!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=7011573 Beth Lott

    “Katie believes that when the movement says that abortion is murder, or a
    genocide, or a holocaust, it makes it hard to have a discussion.”

    This really bothers me. Even if abortion apologists don’t agree with this characterization, this is pro-lifers saying what we actually think. By refusing to even address these terms, the abortion defender is refusing the discussion. It’s not hard to have a discussion because pro-life people call abortion genocide. There are as many ways to respond to that as there are thinking people in the world. It’s hard because abortion apologists don’t respond. You can not have a discussion if only one side is engaged. She’s projecting her lack-of-response, and I don’t think she’s doing it deliberately. It’s hard to get through to someone who doesn’t even realize they are closed-minded.

  • KnowChange

    In Katie’s appearance on No Easy Decision, in addition to her obvious denial of the unhealed hurt that abortion caused her with the relationship with her nephew, what she said about her own abortion was very different than what you usually publicly hear from people who support abortion. When she admitted believing that her child was a living child, and that it was a “parenting decision” to abort that child, my heart sunk. She didn’t claim the child was mere tissue or cells, or pretend the child was less than human in any way. One can only make a parenting decision when one is a parent. Yet, out of convenience or personal preference, she chose to end the life of her child.

    Her situation makes it clear that some people, even when confronted and accepting the truth still make decisions that conflict with our morals. None of us are perfect, but it makes it all the more important for us to understand what leads women to select the paths they do. Through understanding, we can refine our approaches to reach even more women, with compassion, truth, and love.

    • Rebecca Downs

      What a touching and insightful response! I have not seen Katie’s appearance on that show, and from multiple responses it sounds like the way she carried herself was very different. I completely believe in understanding and showing compassion, truth, and love for women.

      I am going on the appearances in which I have seen Katie though, and sadly on “The Stream” she tells a very different story. This is what she is communicating and advocating for presently and it really is a shame. If she believes that her child was a living child and it was a hard decision to make, then she is really doing herself or the memory of her child or women, post-abortive, abortion-minded, or anything in between or at either end of the spectrum any favors. And to me that is really sad and needs attention called to it as well…