Opinion

Conference of Mayors votes to support abortion

The United States Conference of Mayors thinks it’s doing women a favor with the group’s recent resolution to combat the supposed war on women. All they are doing is reiterating the same broken points that the rest of pro-abortion America shouts from the rooftops every chance it gets. Perhaps they think if they say it enough, eventually it will be true. Unfortunately, the one truth about abortion that stands the test of time is that it is the outright murder of one innocent human because one other human deemed that life unwanted, problematic, or unworthy. But the mayors don’t see that.

Abortion Is Not Health Care

Michael Nutter, Philadelphia Mayor and Conference of Mayors President

At their 80th Annual Meeting, the mayors, representing about 1,200 U.S. cities, begin their reproductive rights resolution by stating that “Americans believe that women should be able to consult with their doctor, family, and faith about personal, private medical decisions[.]” This is obvious. What the mayors are failing to realize is that pregnancy is not a disease, and abortion is not health care. Ninety-three percent of abortions are done for social reasons – e.g., birth control failure and a woman simply not wanting her child. One percent occur because of rape or incest. That leaves 6% of abortions that occur for a medical reason. In those cases, the doctor could and the mother should seek other options, including a carefully monitored pregnancy or induced labor in the cases involving complications, an emergency c-section for a mid- to late-term pregnancy health crisis, or adoption if the child has an “abnormality” that the parents don’t feel equipped to handle. Killing the child is not the answer, and all avenues should be taken to try to save both mother and baby.

Abortion is not health care. Health care works to save lives, not end them. In reality, while Americans believe in the right to privacy, we don’t believe that this right allows you to torture and kill other humans (or even animals) behind closed doors.

Ultrasounds Are Standard in Abortion

The mayors’ resolutions goes on to say that “states enacted twice as many anti-choice laws in 2011 as they did in the previous year, including laws that force women who choose abortion care to undergo a forced ultrasound procedure against their will and even if their doctors do not recommend one[.]” But even Planned Parenthood clinics admit that ultrasounds are part of the standard when performing an abortion for the safety of the women receiving abortions. The gestational age of the baby needs to be determined in order to provide the mother with the appropriate abortion method, and an abortionist must use an ultrasound to accurately perform a surgical abortion. The only reason an abortionist would not conduct an ultrasound is if he were not providing women with adequate “care.”

Babies Born at 21 Weeks Have Survived

Then, the mayors write, “eight states since 2010 have enacted laws that ban abortion at 20 weeks, regardless of the women’s situation, without exceptions to protect her health[.]” But unborn humans reach viability shortly after 20 weeks. Within that month, babies have been born and survived as young as 21 weeks and 6 days. The only “situations” the mayors are referring to are those of rape and incest; however, the baby isn’t just the rapist’s child. It’s the mother’s child as well. In addition, the baby did not commit the crime and should, therefore, not be punished by death for it. In the cases of protecting the mother’s health, doctors can attempt to keep the mother safe and healthy, without killing the child, until the child reaches viability and can then be delivered safely and survive.

Doctors against Abortion Offer Other Options in an Emergency

Additionally, the resolution states that “the U.S. House of Representatives also passed … another bill that would allow hospitals to refuse emergency abortion care to women who could die without it[.]” In reality, no good doctor is going to watch a woman die or send her away. But a good, caring doctor will figure out some way to try to save both mother and child by hospitalizing the mother and providing treatment, or inducing labor and trying to save the baby. Abortion is still not the answer.

Planned Parenthood Has Failed in Its Supposed Mission

Of course, the mayors went on to praise Planned Parenthood, saying, “[F]or many women with limited incomes, Planned Parenthood clinics are their point of entry into the health care system[.]” They go on to say that Planned Parenthood’s programs are “essential to reducing rates of unintended pregnancy[.]” This is completely inaccurate. In fact, the Guttmacher Institute reports that in 1994, the rate of unplanned pregnancies among women with incomes below the federal poverty line was 88 per 1,000. By 2006, that number had risen 50% to 132. If Planned Parenthood is such as essential resource and support system for low-income women, why are more and more women facing unplanned pregnancies?

The Right to Life Is Fundamental

Finally, the mayors sum up by vowing to fight pro-life laws, saying that the Conference of Mayors “urges Congress and the states to pursue a positive agenda that reaffirms fundamental rights and improves women’s access to safe and comprehensive reproductive-health care.” But abortion is not a fundamental right, while the right to life is. If we continue to blindly follow the pro-abortion claim that abortion is about health care and private decisions, we will soon witness the legalization of infanticide, now dubbed after-birth abortion. And I’m betting that this same group of mayors will support that as well.

Live Action on Facebook
  • peach

    Planned Parenthood has failed in its supposed mission?? That’s interesting because Mississippi (which I learned from here may be closing it’s last abortion clinic) only has one Planned Parenthood in the sate. It also is the poorest state in the country and has the highest birth rate among teenagers, and the second-highest infant mortality rate, according to statistics compiled by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

    • peach

       state* not sate.

      • Guest

        That statistic also might have something to do with the whole abstinence-only “education” forced on states by the second Bush administration.

  • Shelley

    This commentary is positively frightening. You really think that if a woman’s life is in danger from her pregnancy, she still can’t end it? She has to confine herself to a hospital and just hope nothing unexpected happens?
    I also like how you make wildly baseless claims about “after-birth abortion”. There might be some wackos who talk about it, but as far as I know, no lawmaker or public official of any kind has proposed a bill that would legalize infanticide. No matter how much you want to think otherwise, this really is all about a woman’s right to her body–after the baby is physically separated from her, that’s no longer an issue and she can have nothing more to do with the baby if she so chooses. 

    • http://twitter.com/CalFreiburger Calvin Freiburger

      Oh no, no “public official of any kind” supports infanticide. None at all.

      I mean, aside from the President of the United States:  http://liveaction.org/blog/newt-gingrich-reminds-america-that-the-media-covered-for-barack-obamas-babykilling-past/

      • Shelley

        I was wondering how long it would be till someone brought that up…I’m sorry that Obama was aware of anti-abortion activists’ tactic of whittling down abortion rights little by little and didn’t fall for it in this case since “leaving babies alone to die” (a claim which wasn’t backed up by other witnesses) was and is already illegal under Illinois law. 

        However, to avoid having to explain that (again), you must have missed the fact that I said no one had “proposed a bill that would legalize infanticide”, not “voted against a bill that outlawed something that was already illegal and could have been used to challenge abortion rights in the state of Illinois”.

        • http://twitter.com/CalFreiburger Calvin Freiburger

          Your spin is refuted in the link.

          • Shelley

            Um, refuted by your spin? Yeah, because you don’t have an agenda to push or anything. I can cite my sources too, even though you’ll just come up with the usual garbage about how the facts have a liberal bias: http://mediamatters.org/research/200808220022

          • http://twitter.com/CalFreiburger Calvin Freiburger

            Well, looks like we can add “facts” to the growing list of words you seem to define differently than everyone else…citing notorious hacks like Media Matters doesn’t exactly strengthen your case…though it does fit rather well with the analytical standards of everything else you say.

          • Shelley

            Did I call that, or what? :-)

          • http://twitter.com/CalFreiburger Calvin Freiburger

            I vote “what.”

  • Pingback: Conference of Mayors Votes to Support Abortion | Live Action News & Opinion | A mí, háblame en Cristiano

  • Kimberly Bush

    Dear Shelley, there are practically no restrictions on abortion at all. The way the laws are set up now is that a woman can get an abortion at any time during her pregnancy, even up to the ninth month, as long as she can claim physical or mental distress and gets a doctor to sign off on it.And yes, there are women who truly are in life threatening situations, but sadly, many women who have late term abortions are not in life threatening situations and use this law as a loop hole, eithor because they could not afford an abortion right away and had to wait to get the money. Or because they could not make up their mind about having having an abortion. There are many different reasons why women have late term abortions. Briefly, I would like to mention fetal pain. They did studies, and doctors stuck a 13 week old fetus in the finger with a stick pin. The child pulled it’s finger back and tried to cry in the womb. Doctors have also concluded that a fetus can feel pain at 21 weeks for sure, no doubt. There are late term abortions being done past 21 weeks. What is sad about this is that when they do these late term abortions, the child is given nothing for the pain and they feel everything. Yet, it is considered inhumane to treat a dog or cat that way! Why do we not have more compassion for these little innocent one’s? Have you ever seen a grotesque picture of a late term abortion? They literally rip the heads off their shoulders and tear their limbs off, with no anasthesia given to the little ones for pain! It is so barbaric. One other thing Shelley, if a woman can’t carry a baby full term, it does not mean she has to kill it, they can take the child out early by cesarian section, or induce labor. One other thing…. Many women have died from legal abortion. Deaths by legal abortion are under reported because abortion doctors are afraid of malpractice suits. So when the woman dies, it’s listed as another cause in many cases. There have been so many cover ups by abortion doctor’s. I could go say so much more about this.