investigate

Former Planned Parenthood abortionist caught sexually molesting patients

investigate

A former abortionist has been caught sexually molesting patients and was forced to surrender his medical license:

The longtime medical director of a popular fertility clinic is accused of inappropriately touching and sexually molesting female patients, some while they were under anesthesia, in incidents that date back at least a decade, according to records of a state investigation obtained by the Globe.

A patient first complained about Dr. Roger Ian Hardy in 2004, and over the years employees of the Reading-based fertility clinic said they witnessed at least three other incidents, the records show. Some staff “reported Dr. Hardy’s misconduct’’ to other physicians at the clinic.

While Hardy was working at a fertility center, he was previously an abortionist at Planned Parenthood.

In 1991, Hardy began moonlighting for Planned Parenthood in Santa Clara, California, then moved to Massachusetts in 1992 when he began providing abortions for Planned Parenthood of League of Massachusetts, Inc. In the late 1990’s, documents show he was accused of at least one case of medical malpractice as evidenced in a suit filed against him and Planned Parenthood related to an incomplete abortion. Why he left Planned Parenthood is unknown, but the Boston Globe article published on May 1, 2014, indicates that Hardy’s abhorrent behavior stretched back as far as 20 years, which would include his stint with Planned Parenthood in Massachusetts.

In 2004, a woman filed a complaint with the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine alleging that Hardy took advantage of her while she was under anesthesia at a fertility clinic after discovering suspicious physical injuries the following day. The Board sent her complaint to Hardy, who wrote a long letter denying the charges and suggested that the woman’s injuries were self-inflicted.

The Board closed the complaint without action. The woman wrote a letter back complaining that the Board was not doing its job, but no further action was taken, until recently.

That 2004 complaint was revisited after 18 witnesses came forward to testify against him about his inappropriate sexual behavior not only with his patients, but also female members of his staff. The Board has since determined that Hardy had indeed sexually abused the women who had come forward in 2004.

Why is it that this man was able to practice medicine for 20 years? And while the Boston Globe reports that he molested patients at his fertility clinic, bemoaning the “culture of silence” which allowed him to get away with his sick actions, they have no problem keeping silent about his past with Planned Parenthood.

What if his patients there were molested as well? Even if it’s unintentional, they’re still protecting Planned Parenthood. The “culture of silence” is around Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry, keeping quiet any hint of impropriety or scandal or, worst of all, law-breaking. The media consistently carries water for the abortion lobby, and they’ve done it here again by glossing over this man’s history as an abortionist for Planned Parenthood.

  • Ingrid Heimark
  • PJ4

    I’ve always put abortionists and rapists in the same category.

    • Ingrid Heimark

      They are, they prey on innocent women and children. I put abortionists, child abusers, bullies and animal abusers in my “uncapable of emphathy for others – won’t get any from me”-category. These people make up the very definition of sociopaths. And I ams ure rape is very common in these people’s reckords, they all prey on those weaker than themselves

      • Basset_Hound

        Add drug dealers (particularly crack, meth and heroin) and gang members….

        • john lind

          BH, I’d respectfully disagree with you on drug dealers. Nobody forces somebody to buy drugs. Abortionists, child abusers, bullies and animal abusers all perpetrate aggression against unwilling participants.

          • Basset_Hound

            Agreed. Point well taken….

          • Mary

            Unwilling? So every woman that makes an appointment for an abortion service is unwilling? Even I know, that you know that your logic makes zero sense.

          • Mary

            Unwilling? So every woman that makes an appointment for an abortion service is unwilling? Even I know, that you know that your logic makes zero sense.

          • PJ4

            He was talking about he child in the womb who has no say on whether or not his/her body gets dismembered, put in a biohazard bag and thrown in a dumpster outside the clinic

          • john lind

            Thank you Princess. I know a lot of the pro-feticide types equate killing one’s offspring with the abortionist to shortening one’s hair with the barber, so i can understand her “confusion.”

          • john lind

            Mary, I see that PJ4 quite nicely explained to you that the aggression of the abortionist is perpetrated against the child. I’m assuming your callousness toward the life of an unborn child hampered your ability to comprehend even the simplest of illustrations of the difference between unjust aggressive acts against another (kill the baby, beat the child, bully the other person, abuse the animal) versus a nonaggressive act of two people entering into a voluntary exchange (money for a drugs).

      • DianaG2

        And they scapegoat and victimize the weak, marginalized and vulnerable, behind closed doors — while living a “normal” upstanding, professional life — Publicly.

      • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

        Yes abortionists normally sneak around in the alleys attacking women from behind and perform their dirty deeds.

        • PJ4

          Oh no, they don’t have to sneak around.
          They can perform their dirty deeds(and they’re done​ ​not so​ dirt cheap) in plain sight and with the approval of every feminist, the liberal media and the president
          ​The abortion lobby will even excuse/allow statutory rape, you know , because: choice.​

          http://gazette.com/town-hall-planned-parenthood-worse-than-penn-state/article/143700 http://www.childpredators.com/CoverUp.cfm
          http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/06/13/Planned-Parenthood-Exposed-Probably-Won-t-Report-Statutory-Rape

          If Gosnel didn’t get caught they would have been defending his right to ​​help​​ women

          As a matter of fact,your favorite news outlet,​ RH, did an article defending Karpen

          I’m surprised they haven’t​ defended this guy yet. To date, it’s mostly only conservative outlets reporting on him.
          ​Because:choice.​

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            The accusation that I would be happy with letting rapists, serial or not, getting away, is so ridiculous I will not even waste one word on it. It only shows the total lack of arguments from your side.

          • PJ4

            Psh… and then you went and wasted about 40 words on it.

            The fact that you chose to hone in on one bit of snark in parenthesis and ignored all the other evidence of the abortionists/PP being sexual predators only shows the total lack of arguments (and willingness to defend them with your silence) from your side

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Well you will have to wait for a justification of those from my side (and since I do not justify rape, I did not bother to read them all, I simply do not have that time). I do not defend rapists, no matter if they are abortionists, accountants, farmers or students. Why should I? It is not defendable in any case or under any circumstances.

          • PJ4

            That’s the first time we’ve agreed on anything.

            You still can justify the dismemberment of a child in the womb.
            That’s just as heinous a crime as rape.
            The point however was that abortionists don’t have to sneak around.
            They do their dirty deeds in plain sight and with the approval (silence) of pro abort lobby

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            I will reply to the second part of what you posted, if you agree that it is fairly low accusing pro choicers of supporting rapists.

          • PJ4

            Hmmm.. depends… pro aborts have remained quite silent on this issue.
            That to me is troubling, and approval by silence.

            But ok, I’ll concede that I should not have made that assumption about you.

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Thank you. The vast majority of abortions are performed medically, and involves no dismemberment of the foetus. Since abortion, at any time during the pregnancy, and within the limits of the law, is something that is up to the pregnant woman to decide, I have no problem with her deciding to continue the pregnancy or to abort. That is her decision and her decison only. That is what we mean by choice, and that is why the expression “pro abort” is downright stupid.

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Wow you gave me an upvote! This is getting worrying (joke!)

          • PJ4

            Well, I vehemently disagree with your stance on abortion. No one, not even woman has the right to imprison the child and then kill him or her. The child did not ask to be there and 99% of the time was created by a consensual act.

            But if we can common ground, then that’s a good day.
            I was out of line though, and I’m sincerely sorry if I offended you by insinuating that you would support a rapist.

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Apology accepted. I still think this entire piece on this side has a touch of insinuation along that line of thought, though I hardly can blame you for that.
            I disagree (which you might have guessed by now!) as much with your stance as you do on mine. A moment of thoughtlessness, a failed contraception – whatever the reason, the work with pregnancy and delivery is on her, and thus she also has the right to decide if it is something she wants to interrupt or continue.

          • PJ4

            Here’s another one, I left out.

            Sorry.. like i said.. there’s too many to keep track

            http://townhall.com/columnists/brettharvey/2012/10/05/ohio_cases_put_molesters_and_planned_parenthood_on_notice/page/full

        • Ingrid Heimark

          No, as PJ says, they don’t have to hide to do it. They even charge for it. But you are not bthered that women are raped by abortionists? Why is rape horrible, but when done bby abortionists, it suddenly is either ok or not noteworthy? Don’t these women, who believe the lies of abortion, deserve the pro-aborts support for their decency? Or is the number of abortionists just too important?

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            My reply to this one is identical to the accuasations by PJ4 above. I do not defend rape, and, if you try to be honest, you do not believe yourselves that I do.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            Do you believe this abortionist loose his lisence and go to jail, yes or no?

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            How would I know? I have never claimed to be a specialist of american law.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            If he is guilty, should he loose his lisence or go to jail? Or is abortionists more important that women?

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Of course he should. See my conversation with PJ4, and please stop these silly insinuations that I should support rapists.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            How could we know you didn’t, when your response to an abortionist raping a patient was that we thought abortionists were waiting in the alleys attacking passer-by women? But sure, I am glad you think he should be punished, so do I, and so should all abortion providers that don’t report rape, or that sexually abuse their patients

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Of course an abortion provider that does not report rape or sexually abuse a patient should be reported, and punished if found guilty. Why should there be a certain set of rules applying to them only? And when you find one pro choice site that says anything else, please post the link here.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            I don’t think these rules should apply to abortionists only, the problem is, when abortionists break the rule, someone defends them. When others break the rules, due consequenses is served.

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Then we agree on this one. On the main question, the legality of abortions, we will not agree unless you change your mind.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            Well, that’s not gonna happen :) You should read the book Lime 5, give it a try

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Googled it and it seems to be about the monetary aspects around abortions in the USA? It is sad that people make money out of this, and it only further reiterates what you should have done years ago – making health care (which includes abortions) publicly financed and eliminate the interest of profit in it; just as all other western states has done, even if the solutions differ between countries. Health care is not comparable to other things bought – it is a human right.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            It is a bpok about how women are abused by abortion. Plus abortion isn’t health care, pregnancy is not a disease. Abortion is the only “medical” procedure that produces a dead body. Thus, it should not be funded. Health care is a right, but without the right to life, there is no right to health. It’s kinda interesting that those who want our morals out of their vaginas, wants their hands in our wallets

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            I suggest you visit the One in three campaign web site, where lots of women testify of their abortions. You put medical in “…well if it is not medical with either pills or surgery, what would it be then. And your last sentence, well, I will not reply to it all, since my views on that aspect was made very clear in my previous post.
            And pregnancy is not a disease, but an unwanted pregnancy is a condition that every woman has the right to end, safe, legal, accessible, and at a cost comparable to other health care. Because it is health care, and nobody has the right to decide for her.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            Rape and murder is also common, so I don’t need to se that frequency equals right. But you still haven’t answered my question, why should we pay for it?

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Because you have not asked that question.
            And you are once again back at implying that I defend rape and murder? How incredibly primitive.
            Finally we get to the point that is the most important to “pro lifers” – why should we pay for it? Well why would you ever pay for anything for anyone else? Why are some things financed by taxes? Because it is the most efficient way of organizing things, and unless you live in a hole in the ground somewhere, you are a part of society whether you like it or not. And some things, most obviously health care, are not of such a nature that market solutions are applicable.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            No, I didn’t imply you defended rape and murder, I simply implied that something common doesn’t make it right.

            And I will gladly pay for someone else, if it’s benefitting them and not morally wrong. I willg ladly pay for someones STD treatments, their cancer treatment, their prenatal care. I want to pay for someones antipsychotic medication, and I want to pay for the care a woman who has injured herself need. I do not want to pay for abortions that kills one life when two would otherwise live. Sure it is simpler to have everyone pay for healthcare, but what if I have Body Dysmorphic Syndrome, would you pay for my knee amputation that is not medically nessessary because it is more efficient that way?

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Ok, so you compare a woman who wants to have an abortion with someone suffering from a diagnosed mental illness? Says something of how you see other women. Personally I believe they are capable of making decisions about themseleves in a way that those suffering from BDD do not. But I guess we have different views on that one too

          • Ingrid Heimark

            No, I am comparing the procedures in way of medical nessecity and who should pay. Abortions that are purely elective should not be paid for by taxpayers unless you want to fund other medically unnessesary procedures that are wanted by the patient. Plus, A BDD syfferer don’t want your money to take a life, they hurt nooone but themselves. You are reading my comments by a lense that says I am your definition of anti-woman. You should try reading that I really says.

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            If she wants the abortion, then it is medically necessary, since forced birth is just as bad as forced pregnancy. And yes, in my opinion, “pro life” equals anti-woman. But I get it, it hurts more in your wallet than it hurts your morals.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            No you don’t get it. So you would consider the abortion Josie Cunningham was about to have was medically nessesary? And where the he** did you get that it hurts my wallet more than my morals? What hurts my wallet most is taking care of a woman’s children, yet that doesn’t bother me. I want to use money on women and children, but not killing her child.

            You are not reading what I say, so there is no point in duscussing with you until you do

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            I had no idea who Jose Cunningham was until now so I had to quickgoogle her. Yes, if she decided that this was not the point for a child, then it is ok with me.
            What really hurts you is that awful thought that women should have the same chance to rule their lives as we men have always had. And yes, I read what you say it is the same sad rants as all self-appointed “pro lifers” come up with to cover up the fact that they can not accept the fact that women will not go back to the middle ages. And that decent men support them against attacks from religious bigots and disturbed republican$.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            I know you are ok with her killing her child, I asked if it was medically nessessary. And then you come with the usual pro-abortion babble, well, I have been very patient with you, because I actually believed you had potential to be a serious partner. I was wrong. Go live your life with your prejudices. I am not interested in wasting my time anymore.

            I am kinda frustrated, I read your comments, even when you think I accuse you of something I don’t, I correct it. You don’t give me the same courtesy. So have a nice day

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            You too. And those who are really patient are the women of America who puts up with the way too frequent on their human rights, performed by those who pose as “pro life”. These women (and men) are admirable.
            And thank you for your interest in me as a partner, but I am happily married since many years.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            Discussion partner, and I am sure you knew that. But truly, if this is your repsonse when someone calls you on your bullshit, you should quit the internet. A discussion is reading what people say, not give them the opinions you think they have. And if you are caught giving opinions, you should try to consider what people say, instead of acting like a child.

            You may think you somehow beat me, but in fact, you give opinions, you don’t read what I answer, and then you use your own opinions of mine to give the standard pro-abortion crap about pro-lifers.

            Now you can go to bed, because you are discussing like a child in the kindergarden.

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Oh I am sorry, but I thought you had some sense of humour. Apparently I was wrong.
            And once again, there is no such thing as pro abortion, pro choice on the other hand is quite a common stance.
            No I will not go to bed, I am about to have lunch. May you live happily in your illusion that you beat me. We both know better. Sweet dreams.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            I know I beat you, because as soon as you could’t respond sensibly, you started with stupid. Go take a nap after lunch, it is good to grow on.

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            It is rather that I lose interest in these discussions since both sides are so fixed in their views. I am only thankful to live in a country where “pro lifers” are a minority <5%. So far you do not pose any real threat to my near and dear, unlike you do in USA. And after lunch I prefer to take a walk in the sun, spring is in the air.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            So then just say it, instead of making stupid comments that makes everyone oelse think you don’t know how to discuss. I rather discuss with somone that says that ok, we won
            t agree on this, then one who starts calling me different things and giving me opinions I don’t have. Really. Agreeing to disagree is not a failure in a discussion, hurdling nonsense is. I wonder, if you are having lunch, you live in Europe, Scandinavia? Norway? As I do, I have to go to work for a few hours, a meeting, so maybe we live in the same zone

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Of course I can say that I tire of discussions (I was also hungry which badly affects my mood!), but I still have the feeling that what I say is what is at the core of all ”pro lifers” thoughts. And I think it is fairly clear that we will not agree on this. Re that model, already forgot her name, if she thinks it is necessary for her well being, than it is necessary, even if calling it medically necessary is stretching it all a bit far. The medically necessary abortions are few, but I think we can agree that those exist. Most are because she wants them – and that is as valid reason as any other reason. To compare it all to psychiatric conditions is silly – psychiatry is an exception in medicine, where the position of the patient vis-à-vis the treating medical professional is, due to the diseases very nature, a lot weaker. And when it comes to a decision (now I am back at abortions) that is forever life-changing for her, she must have the final word. Denying her that is denying her the right to her life – and I will not back one inch on that.

            Yes, I was starting to wondering if you never sleep, but it had an explanation then. Inte Norge, men grannen i öster.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            Well, the definition of medically nessesary are probably different from yours, but what I consider medically nessesary means some pregnancies cannot be carried to term, my opposition to abortion are the ones that ends one life when two would otherwise die, not the ones that saves the mother when two, or she, would die. And sure you can say you are tired of discussions, I would rather prefer you do it in a way that does not insult the one you discuss with.

            And your assumption that all pro-lifers are the same are wrong, I am very liberal when it comes to social issues, Also when it comes to taxpayerfunding of healthcare. I do however find it very disturbing that I asa taxpayer pays for abortions in full, whilst young women with low income have to pay for her anti-psychotic medication if she is willing to receive treatment, until she has paid a certain amount. That I do not like, not at all. Heia Norge :)

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            I do not think all ”pro lifers” are the same. But I think, and I am quite convinced we both can agree on this one, that “pro lifers” in general tend to be more conservative than the population as a whole. And your views on medication for those suffering from any kind of mental illness, well I do share that to a 100%. There is no group in todays society which is as exposed as those people, and that is a shame.
            I do not mean to insult anyone, but I think that the entire “pro life” agenda is an insult to women, and that enrages me. Heja Sverige – vi vann över er I förrgår kväll. Och Northug har haft väldigt svårt att få någon sympati här. En extremt osportslig person. Intressant att vi för den här debatten på engelska, men vi får väl utgå från att vi har en publik!

          • Ingrid Heimark

            Ja, Northug har vært en idiot, det er sikkert :) Og gratulerer :)

            It’s one thing I would like to debate…. Yes, we pro-lifers believe a woman should not have the right to abort her child. Question to you, why do you think that is? Is it because we think less of women? Or because we believe the child to be valuable andshould be allowed to live?

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Tack, även om det var med minsta möjliga marginal. Norge gjorde en bra match.
            The main problem with your question is, that if I tell you why I think you have come to your stance, is that you will say that I am offending you. By answering like this, you know what I mean and I am still able to maintain a decent level in this discussion.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            Ok, so if I say that I have all the confidence in the world to women, I just believe fetal life, male and female, have the same value, you don’t believe I believe what I say? And no, I won’t be offended, simply because I am asking, and you should not ask that directly unless you can take the answer

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            OK then I admit that I think that those who are not openly anti-women (like republicans) have their minds clouded by religious stupidities.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            Ok, but my view are not based on religion, and socially I am very liberal. So maybe we then can agree that not all pro-lifers or pro-choicers are like the stereotypes say?

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            Just for your information, since other “pro lifers” has changed their posts afterwards, I have screenshots of this one and the other one.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            Actually, THAT is insulting, more than saying what you think of me. But anyway. I read your post in moderation. I am christian, but my view on abortion are not based on religion. My view of abortion are based on embryology, growing up as a wanted yet unwelcome child, and basic science. I have ever used religion to justify my view on abortion. I have discussed the spiritual implications of abortion as I see it, but the only religious base for my view on abortion is thou shalt not kill, and I assume most atheists agree with me on that. We obviously have a different view on when protectable live starts, and my view is based on science and embryology

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            I have had that experience with other “pro lifers” (PJ4 changed a post afterwards to make me look stupid), so I take no chances. As long as the pregnant woman needs an abortion, and the reason is valid (which all reasons except sex selection are) her will is more important. And I do not know norwegian laws, but I guess it is roughly as ours (no questions asked up until 18 weeks, regulated up to 22 weeks); and in my opinion that is an excellent compromise. But the main reason I discuss this is: It is not your business what she does. Don’t like abortions? Don’t have one. It is as simple as that.
            I hope moderators can handle my post. It has not showed up yet here.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            Your post is in moderation because all posts with links are in moderation. PJ changer her post because she did a typo….

            In Norway we have free abortion until week 12, and then regulated until week 22. It was longer, week 23, but after babies vere born alive and left to die, with some showing signs of life as long as 90 minutes after the abortion, the upper limit are now 22 weeks.

            The weird thing is, most states in the US that have fetal pain bills, I assume you are opposed to those, have the same limit. Yet setting the limit at 22 weeks (20 weeks fetal age) seems extreme for many pro-aborts. Do you agree with such a limit?

            Edit: I ahve read that norwegian women have abortion in Sweden for fetal disease after week 22

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            As far as I can see, my post has not showed up yet. Probably your moderators could not handle it. I am not sure, but I think that I have said before that I think our set of rules is a good compromise. And I still think the expression “pro abort” is ridiculous.

          • Ingrid Heimark

            The term pro-abort is completely valid, jst look at the new story on LAN by Sarah Terzo, that is not pro-choice.

            And on the other, I totally disagree, however, you are one of the more reasonable of my opponents, and as such hope to have further discussions with you

          • http://batman-news.com Mummel18000

            If I am reasonable, it is because I know I am right, and do not have to use capital letters or strong words. I think however, that you should find it more stimulating discussing on a pro choice side

          • Sara

            I am a non-religious pro-lifer, but everyone I discuss abortion with on the internet automatically assumes I am a christian hah… So I agree with you full heartedly, pro-lifers aren’t all the same

      • Mary

        Tell me how they prey on innocent women? Tell me? Do they hide in ally ways and demand for pregnant women to lay down so that they may perform abortions on them? These women seek out the obstetrician that performs these services. These women seek them out because it’s what they want.

      • Mary

        Tell me how they prey on innocent women? Tell me? Do they hide in ally ways and demand for pregnant women to lay down so that they may perform abortions on them? These women seek out the obstetrician that performs these services. These women seek them out because it’s what they want.

        • Ingrid Heimark

          Did these women according to the article in question, ask to be sexually molested?

        • Ingrid Heimark

          Did these women according to the article in question, ask to be sexually molested?

    • JDC

      Well, when they turn out to be the same people this often, you might as well.

      • PJ4

        Hey JDC, shoot me an email if you can please!
        sritalia@hotmail.com

        • DianaG2

          PJ, you better delete this, ok? Quickly.

        • JDC

          I’m embarrassed to say that I didn’t get to this until after you deleted your e-mail address. If you still want to talk to me, feel free to try and give it to me again.

  • MamaBear

    I wonder, had he not been an abortionist, would action on the complaints have been taken sooner?

    • DianaG2

      Yes, that is a good question.

      It’s as if abortionists can do no wrong at all. I’m hoping that will change with the Gosnell movie. {♥Yes, they did make that goal!!♥}

      Abortionists are basically in the same position Catholic priests were in a long time ago — Golden Child! Incapable of being questioned.

      My mom and dad were both molested by priests in the ’30′s, when they were little. And, not even in the same city. I grew up knowing all about it all my life.

      You wouldn’t speak of it, though.

      “How dare you say such a thing about Father, you ungrateful little wretch, after all he’s done for you. You must be a tool of the devil.”

      • MamaBear

        It is not good for anybody to be put on a pillar like that. Big difference between healthy respect for the position and the man (or woman) and the attitude that they can do no wrong.

        If men who are supposed to have devoted their lives to God can fall like that, why on earth would we expect those who devote their lives to killing little unborn babies to be any better?

        • DianaG2

          Right.

  • mark

    Planed Parenthood should be called. Baby Murder Inc. They only plan death!

  • Carol Meeker

    really confused about the irony of him working at a fertility clinic AND at Planned Parenthood….seems like one contradicts the other…or perhaps I need more caffeine to figure that out…
    I know we need to pray for him as well as his victims…but gee whiz, some people are certainly harder to pray for than others!

    • DianaG2

      yes

    • http://batman-news.com Evelyn

      I am sure that in his mind these jobs were very similar, especially if he was thinking of himself and his sick desires rather than the need of the patient. It sure is easier to pray for his victims, you’re right about that.

    • Mary

      Well, let me help your little brain: Some people want to have babies and can’t, so they seek fertility treatments. Some people get pregnant via rape, incest, accidentally when they are without the funds to raise a child, or are unable to carry a baby to term, like me, who has an incompetent cervix. I carried the baby, but I was bed rested for 6 months. How many poor women can afford to lay in bed without working for 6 months? See, there is this magical way of thinking. What we do is we step outside of ourselves to see that there are BILLIONS of people on earth, many of which with vastly different backgrounds. Many people who have circumstances different from our own! It’s absolutely amazing! We just have to take a step back, remind ourselves that we aren’t the only person in the universe and we can see that some people have totally different lives that us, and the choices they make bear no meaning on our own lives, because it is their business. Does that clear it up for you?

      • PJ4

        and the choices they make bear no meaning on our own lives, because it is their business

        http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/04/14/mother-reveals-grisly-details-confesses-to-killing-six-of-her-newborn-babies-police/

        So, because this has no bearing on your life, she shouldn’t be brought to justice, right?

        Please tell me you’re not the kind of person who would just watch their a stranger being brutally raped, mugged or murdered and just do nothing about it as it has no bearing on your own life.

        • Basset_Hound

          Then there was Marybeth Tinning who LOVED the sympathy and attention she got when one of her children died. So she just kept killing them. I mean after all, who are we to judge HER parenting choices, right? I mean weren’t her choices her business?

    • Mary

      Well, let me help your little brain: Some people want to have babies and can’t, so they seek fertility treatments. Some people get pregnant via rape, incest, accidentally when they are without the funds to raise a child, or are unable to carry a baby to term, like me, who has an incompetent cervix. I carried the baby, but I was bed rested for 6 months. How many poor women can afford to lay in bed without working for 6 months? See, there is this magical way of thinking. What we do is we step outside of ourselves to see that there are BILLIONS of people on earth, many of which with vastly different backgrounds. Many people who have circumstances different from our own! It’s absolutely amazing! We just have to take a step back, remind ourselves that we aren’t the only person in the universe and we can see that some people have totally different lives that us, and the choices they make bear no meaning on our own lives, because it is their business. Does that clear it up for you?

  • Taking care of business!

    What’s the difference to these godless monsters?

  • JCLincoln

    Baby murderer, sexual molester………..what’s the difference?

  • Betty

    Planned Parenthood doesn’t care what the Drs. do as long as they can make money.

  • TODD

    Why would anyone want to kill their child? Why is becoming a murderer more important than being a mother? Where is the voice of all fathers concerning this matter? Why is this sick and disgusting act so empowering to some? Is there no fear of God in the land? If a mother took her child and threw him/her off of a building whether the child dies or not, should the mother not be punished? What kind of person would believe that the mother shouldn’t? What have we become in this world?