Human Rights

Institutionalized child abuse

Child abuse is an issue that is considered, across the board, to be wrong. Even in a world where morals are often philosophically questioned, hurting a child to the point of injury or fatality is still one of the most horrific acts imaginable.

Why is that? We really shouldn’t have to ask this question, but it brings up some interesting points. Children, after all, do not pay taxes. They don’t contribute to society, and they are far from being valuable citizens. They eat up our resources and cause a whole lot of problems economically, once education is considered.

Technically, I’m one of those children. I don’t have a job, and I still go to public school. Why does it matter if someone beats me to death? My demise would not damage society as a whole in the slightest, because I haven’t really done anything of importance yet.

This argument is ridiculous, right? As “logical” as it might be, the murder of a child, the murder of anyone, is morally wrong, and I think most people would agree. Despite my young age, I am still a person with thoughts and feelings, and I have aspirations that I’ve developed over the course of my short lifetime. Killing me, killing a three-year-old, killing a twelve-week fetus – what’s the difference but a few added years of experience? We all have potential, and destroying that potential is morally reprehensible.

Abortion is really no different from institutionalized child abuse. It is shameful that we live in a world that values the life of children we can see, children with whom we can physically interact, far above children too young to thrive outside their mothers’ bodies. Why is it that those non-tax-paying, non-beneficial beings whom we can’t see with our own eyes are so much less important?

In 2010 alone, an estimated 1,560 American children died from abuse and neglect. On any given day, approximately 3,700 abortions are performed in the United States. These figures are staggering and heart-wrenching. I don’t want any child to die, let alone a child who hasn’t seen the light of day.

Some people feel otherwise, and I have to respect that. The issue of abortion is deep and wrought with emotion. Painful experiences add up to create a controversy that will probably never go away. All I ask is that we think of the children before we think of ourselves.

Think of the children who are saved from abusive situations, who are put up for adoption and loved for who they are. Think of the children who don’t yet know that they almost didn’t make it, pre-birth or otherwise. Think of your own children, for whom you would do anything. All of these precious beings could have been destroyed without a second thought.

When a child is abused, no one cares about the “choice” of the abuser, who is almost always a parent. We don’t give him the right to hurt his child, even if he really wants to, even if it’s in his “best interest.” There are plenty of laws against that, and if he were to kill his child, the consequences would be dire.

For some reason, the law doesn’t apply this philosophy to pregnant twenty-something women. There is something very wrong with that.

We know that children are innocent, that they have done nothing to deserve harm. We naturally sympathize with children, protecting them from danger regardless of class or creed. Children are inspirational in their capacity for understanding, often naturally lacking prejudice that adults must strive to repress. Children are wonderful pieces of society, and to lose just one to any type of abuse is a sign of a world in need of improvement. Don’t let anyone convince you otherwise.

Live Action on Facebook
  • http://twitter.com/Castanza777 rosemary Castanza

    The Lord will PREVAIL

  • http://twitter.com/Castanza777 rosemary Castanza

    question? if a parent aborted a child because at the time it was” inconvenient” and than later on they have a child,and that child dies befor the parent, is it right for that parent to BLAME GOD? and ask why me???

    • http://twitter.com/Castanza777 rosemary Castanza

      I think NOT

  • http://twitter.com/Castanza777 rosemary Castanza

    or they ignore the killing of babies and their child dies, why is that child more important than other children they know are getting murderd every day

  • Amanda Borenstadt

    This is a well thought out and well written argument. And I don’t say that just because I agree with every word. :)

  • Pingback: Institutionalized Child Abuse | Live Action News & Opinion | A mí, háblame en Cristiano

  • sorceress2000

    Children are not non-contributing members of society…they are our future. Money spent on them isn’t a waste or drain on resources…it is an investment. Our economy is a shambles because millions of taxpayers/consumers have been (and continue to be) eliminated before they could even take their first breath or utter their first cry.

  • Anonymous

    I take issue with two of your statements: “For some reason, the law doesn’t apply this philosophy to pregnant twenty-something women.” The reason is simple. Their bodies are being infringed upon, and they can’t take their bodies back without causing the death of the fetus. A person who abuses their born children, however, doesn’t have to deal with them if he doesn’t want to. He could contact the state and relinquish custody.

    “Despite my young age, I am still a person with thoughts and feelings, and I have aspirations that I’ve developed over the course of my short lifetime.” Right–and fetuses at the time of most abortions don’t have thoughts, feelings, or aspirations. They have the potential to develop them, I suppose, but until approximately 18-22 weeks (depending upon whom you ask) their nervous systems aren’t sufficiently developed to produce any brain activity.

    • grdawg

      People need to realize that the unborn child,
      prior to 12 weeks gestation, is much more developed than you are stating here.
      The heart begins to beat (a measure of life we use for born people) at only 21
      days. Brain waves can be measured at 6 weeks (another measure of life). Both of
      these measures of life that we so commonly use occur before many women even
      know they’re pregnant. Also, some studies show that an unborn child may be able
      to feel pain as early as 5.5 weeks.http://www.aul.org/2008/03/fet… The incredible humanity and individuality of the
      unborn child does indeed exist at the time of every abortion, including those
      before 12 weeks. This modern report shares amazing facts we should all be aware
      of in this debate:http://www.dakotavoice.com/Doc

    • http://www.facebook.com/julianna.isis.3 Julianna Isis

      Yeah. Before you start telling Her what is or isn’t actually able to happen in a babies body and mind before it is 18-22 weeks old you should learn correct grammer.

      • Anonymous

        Huh? Actually, I’m pretty sure I posted a reply to that several hours ago refuting the allegation that brain waves are detectable in a 6-week-old fetus. I don’t know if there was a glitch or if a mod deleted it since it doesn’t fit with the party line…

        But if you really want to get into grammar, I can find several mistakes in that single sentence you’ve written: the “h” in “her” should be lower-case; “babies” is plural and not possessive while it should be singular and possessive: “baby’s”; “grammar” is spelled with an “a”, not an “e”. Would you care to point out whatever grammatical error you noticed in my post? I’m actually a proofreader, so I take great care with that but of course I’m not perfect, and I’d actually appreciate it if you’d let me know if I’ve made an error.

        • Bobbi Chrylser

          I like how you choose to post as Anonymous… Why can’t the identity of this person who supports the murder of an unborn child be shown to those of us who don’t? I also would like to state that all the people who do not support abortion show their name. They want people to know that they are pro-life. Just saying.

  • Rebecca Downs

    Wow, this is a very interesting article! I can’t say I have ever thought about abortion and child abuse this way, but it is indeed quite similar!

    When a child is abused, no one cares about the “choice” of the abuser, who is almost always a parent. We don’t give him the right to hurt his child, even if he really wants to, even if it’s in his “best interest.” There are plenty of laws against that, and if he were to kill his child, the consequences would be dire.

    That paragraph especially I believe drives the point home…