Human Rights

Let’s be honest: the “war on women” starts in the womb

She was only 13. Thirteen. And she had been gang-raped by three men. Aisha Ibrahim Duhulow reported her rape to the authorities only to find herself accused of adultery by the Islamic militia in Kismayo, Somalia. In front of 1,000 people, she was stoned to death in a Somali stadium on October 27, 2008.

Without a doubt, a real war on women is raging throughout the world. The death of Aisha Ibrahim Duhulow exemplifies this war: a woman killed unjustly, without rights, without a voice.

Alicia Gali, an Australian woman in her twenties, was put in jail in the United Arab Emirates after reporting being raped by four co-workers who had drugged her first. Instead of receiving justice, Alicia Gali was imprisoned for adultery.

Scales of Justice in Bath, England. Photo credit: m.gifford on Flickr

Pro-choice advocates like to argue about “reproductive justice.” My question for them is this: “Where are you when women like Aisha and Alicia are imprisoned and killed simply because they were victims of sexual crimes? When do you speak out about justice for them? Why aren’t their stories all over your websites?” You would think that “reproductive justice,” if it were an honest issue, would be about women having the right to refuse sex without being punished for it and women having the right to report a rape without being stoned or imprisoned for it.

But instead, the bottom line of “reproductive justice” is women supposedly having the right to kill their unborn children for any reason, at any time. Far from being “justice,” this “right” is actually part of the war on women – the war on women in the womb. If a woman’s right to be born is taken from her before she even has a chance to raise her voice, what kind of justice is that? If women’s numbers are being decimated without the choice of those being killed, what kind of choice is that? Abortion is one of the worst crimes against humanity in the war on women.

Women’s Rights Without Frontiers has revealed a report from the blind Chinese activist, Chen Guangcheng. The fourteen “Notes” in this report uncover drastic and torturous actions by Chinese officials who have been tasked with enforcing the One Child Policy. Pregnant women are detained because a relative of theirs had an “extra” or “out-of-policy” child. Mothers with small children are arrested. Women are forcibly sterilized. They are drugged and given forced abortions, even though their babies would have been born mere weeks – or days – later. Female relatives of people with extra children are beaten and tortured for days in punishment. Chinese officials use the beating and torture of family members to force pregnant women to come out of hiding so the officials can forcibly abort their babies. China is one of the worst offenders in the war on women.

The Economist reported on a typical scenario in China:

A baby girl is born in China’s Shandong province. Chinese writer Xinran Xue, present for the birth, then hears a man’s voice respond to the sight of the newborn baby girl. “Useless thing,” he cried in disappointment. The witness then heard a plop in the slops pail. “To my absolute horror, I saw a tiny foot poking out of the pail. The midwife must have dropped that tiny baby alive into the slops pail!”  When she tried to intervene she was restrained by police. An older woman simply explained to her, “Doing a baby girl is not a big thing around here.”

Yet we in America, while we love to denounce China’s human rights violations, sit by and allow our own slaughter of the innocents to continue. How often do we raise our voices on behalf of the women yet to be born? How often do we demand to hear their tiny voices, crying out for life? They are women killed unjustly, without rights, without a voice.

In the midst of this war on women, we must make several demands:

  1. The right for women to report rape and sexual assault in Islamic countries without fear of retaliation or death.
  2. The right for Chinese mothers to give birth to all of their children without fear of punishment, fines, and abuse.
  3. The right for all women, everywhere, to be born.
  4. The right for all women, everywhere, to be given a choice in whether or not they are sentenced to death without ever being able to raise their voice.
  5. The right for all women, everywhere, to have abortion – one of the greatest crimes against humanity – come to an end.

We must stand for justice, true justice, for all women. If justice does not start with the women in the womb, it is not justice at all. Let us make our voices heard. We demand an end to the war on women in the womb. This is where justice starts. Planned Parenthood is an offender. They have failed women. They wage war on women in the womb, and their time to honor abortion has ended. Love, law, and peace will soon bring an end to legal abortion. And on that day, women everywhere will rejoice.

Live Action on Facebook
  • First Citizen

    I have often noticed the double standard of liberals on this issue. Abortion is a right according to them, but women in other countries do not have a right to life…Wait women in this country do not have a right if they are unborn.
    For Life
    visit my blog at aconstitutionalconservative.blogspot.com or
    prolifeaction.blogspot.com

  • Guest

    I notice that the only “support” you offered for your claim that stories of violence against women are not covered by pro-choice sites was a link to a blog post here at Live Action.  I’m sure that blogger is well-intentioned, but her research skills appear to be rudimentary at best.

    The story of Aisha Ibrahim Duhulow was covered at length on the reliably pro-choice sites The Huffington Post and SalonRH Reality Check excerpted the Huffpo article and linked to it.  Bloggers on two other liberal sites, ThinkProgress and Slate, mentioned the story (though not the victim’s name) within stories on Somalia.  NARAL, NOW, and Planned Parenthood Federation of America do not cover international news on their websites, but Planned Parenthood International mentioned it (also without the victim’s name) in a story about several stonings in Somalia. See the links below.  (Though I give only one link for each site, the Huffpo and Salon covered it in multiple columns.)

    I didn’t find as much on Alicia Gali, but any site that deals with women’s issues internationally reports on and condemns the inability of women in some parts of the world to report sexual assault without repercussion.  And yes, groups like Planned Parenthood International do work against tolerance of sexual abuse and forced abortion.  You simply choose to ignore it.

    Ironically, you would be supporting Islamic law if it were being used to deny an abortion to a 13-year-old rape victim who wanted to terminate a pregnancy.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/02/13yearold-rape-victim-sto_n_140242.html
    http://open.salon.com/blog/the_ranting_boomer/2008/11/01/13_year_old_girl_confirmed_dead
    http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/11/03/roundup-sundown-colorado-fundamentalists-television-teen-pregnancy
    http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2008/12/06/190847/terrible_to_even_worse_in_somalia
    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2009/01/would_you_like_to_be_president_of_somalia.html
    http://www.ippf.org/en/News/Intl+news/Somali+woman+stoned+for+adultery.htm
    http://www.ippf.org/en/What-we-do

    • Guest

      “And yes, groups like Planned Parenthood International do work against tolerance of sexual abuse and forced abortion. You simply choose to ignore it.”

      So… Live Action themselves performed a sting operation regarding sexual abuse and forced abortion.  The employees were found to be not only condoning but also abetting “pimps” looking to get abortions for their underage workers.  How is that working against tolerance?

    • grdawg

      Well maybe if Planned Parenthood, NOW, and NARAL want to claim that they are truly opposed to the “war on women”, they should start speaking out on international issues.  They clearly don’t know what a war really is.  They don’t speak out on international issues that clearly constitute a war on women, and they advocate for the “war on women in the womb” as the author said here at home in America.  What stellar organizations.  I suppose you’d expect HuffPost and the like to mention the case in Somalia at least…it was a pretty extreme story, and plus, the HuffPost would consider itself a news site.  That’s not exactly the same as pro-choice advocacy sites like Planned Parenthood, NOW, and NARAL.  They are the ones who need to get their facts straight about the real war going on.

    • Kristiburtonbrown

      According to the links you gave, the best most of these pro-choice sites can do is just tell about the stoning as a news story?  Where’s the outrage?  Where do they talk about this as the real “war on women”?  (Planned Parenthood International even sources the BBC for their article…could they not bother to do their own story?)  Even if pro-choice sites mention an occasional story here or there, they do not adequately express outrage for the true war against women.  They’d rather focus on continuing the war on women in the womb.  They talk about that FAR more and advocate for it at an even greater rate.

      • Guest

        Planned Parenthood International even sources the BBC for their article…could they not bother to do their own story?

        You mean, like you ‘bothered’ to do your ‘own story?’  Kristi, when a blogger summarizes a news story about a rape and then adds how it made her feel, she’s not doing a story about the rape.  She’s doing a story about herself.  Blogging has a place in the news world, and some bloggers do actual news.  But when a site doesn’t add a verbal frowny face to a piece of journalism, it doesn’t mean that they’re indifferent.  Sometimes it just means that they assume their readers are capable of apprehending horror without needing a verbal frowny face to tell them what to feel.

        However, as I said in my first post, the Huffington Post and Salon both had multiple postings on the Somali case.  If you want to see outrage, then do your homework and read the stories, because yes, it is there.

        Even if pro-choice sites mention an occasional story here or there, they
        do not adequately express outrage for the true war against women.

        I would try to explain to you that you are not, actually, the judge of what is ‘true’ for anyone other than you, but previous experience shows that would be an exercise in futility.

        • Oedipa

          The media criticism in these parts is mostly feckless. B-list and C-list celebrities come under attack for their policy positions. Tweets by actresses and comedians most people had forgotten (Sally Kellerman? Kathy Griffin?) get vivisected. There’s a scathing book review up today that’s a gazillion words long about a book that’s 288,477th over at Amazon. And as if the fun-house mirror of writing on the internets about other writers on the internets didn’t make you woozy enough, then there’s also the *writers on the internets who aren’t writing about the things they should be writing about!* for the sake of the latest, greatest feigned indignation.

    • First Citizen

      NOW of Utah has endorsed polygamy.

      • http://www.facebook.com/jeep.obsessed Brooke Mehr

        I would love to see where you get that information.

        • First Citizen

          Lucy Mallon Vice Chairman of Utah NOW and Ellen George, State Secretary for Utah NOW said the following in the Washington Times;
          “It seems like a pretty good idea for professional women, who can proceed with their careers and have someone at home to watch their kids. It solves the Daycare problem.” Mallon
          George added;
          “This isn’t blatant support for polygamy, but maybe it can work for some people, and maybe it can make raising children easier for those trying to juggle careers and motherhood.”
          So although I was wrong in saying they endorse it I am correct in saying that they do not condemn it. 

  • Bercola

    You are not talking about America, go to Iraq, Iran, ect and tell them how their women should be treated.  I do not want to pay for your protection, If you cant afford to pay for it keep your legs closed.

  • Guest

    Up to about six month of pregnancy, as long as a woman carries a baby in her own body, it is up to her alone to decide whether she should carry it to term.  This has been a practice since ancient times and no law will change that.  Those who are against abortions are free not to have any.  They should focus on their own lives and behavior first and may help others if the help is welcome.

    • MoonChild02

      “Those who are against abortions are free not to have any.”
      Bull. Forced abortions happen all the time. I know, it happened to my aunt. Please stop telling people that they’re free to not choose abortion, when many, many women have come forward and said that they didn’t choose the abortion they had for themselves.

      Furthermore, everyone knows that the biological reason for sex is procreation, and contraception is not 100% effective. Therefore, in having sex, one chooses to risk becoming pregnant. If one engages in adult activities, one should take responsibility for one’s actions. That means, if you have sex and become pregnant, then you have chosen to
      create a life which you now have the responsibility to look after. That baby did not choose to be there, s/he was forced into your body by the choices you made. You chose to put her or him there. If you don’t want to be an adult and take responsibility for your actions, you shouldn’t engage in adult activities – it’s as simple as that.

    • First Citizen

      telling Pro-life citizens that if we don’t like abortion we should not have one, is like telling Bonhoeffer that if he did not like the holocaust he should not kill jews. The reason we oppose abortion is because it kill the unborn. Also abortion does not deal with the women’s body but rather with another person’s, an unborn baby. 
      Your claim about this being the practice since ancient time is an appeal to tradition. If something is traditional does that automatically make it right? Under that belief Infanticide and Slavery should be legal.
      For Life
      First Citizen
      Visit my blog at; 
      aconstitutionalconservative.blogspot.com
      or
      pro-lifeaction.blogspot.com 

  • Peach

    Please don’t claim to speak for all women. I can guarantee you that not all women everywhere will rejoice if abortion is made illegal. 

  • Antonio D. Bernate III

    I love God given life.

  • bnotestine

    They know not what they do. War on women? Look again:
    Psalm 139:13 For you created my inmost being; 
        you knit me together in my mother’s womb.

  • Oedipa

    I’m going to proffer a little context. I think it’s fair to say many people in the pro-life community come at it from an evangelical point-of-view. There’s a missionary zeal in many churches that leads to a truly global frame of reference. The Christan community has been vitally active in Africa for decades now, more so than any other group. I think it’s also fair to say many people in the pro-choice community come to it from a political point-of-view. In that sense, we seek to effect what we can effect: politics in our own country. Not politics in Somalia or the United Arab Emirates or Ubekkibekki-stan-stan, where we have no standing.

    Look, I lament to soul-crushing condition of women in the Middle East as much as you do. But if reading a few articles about their subjugation and slapping together a list of demands on the interwebs is all it takes to enlist in the fight for the War on the War on Women, then, damn, that was easy! I’m ready!

    • Kristiburtonbrown

      Ooh…you’re ready?  So you’re ready to stand against the war on women in the womb, too?  Cause that’s the war that’s killed the most women so far…guaranteed.

      • Kristiburtonbrown

        Oh yes, and also…I don’t see how a political point-of-view should preclude international politics.  International issues are actually a big part of the American political scene.  In addition, evangelical or not, people who are focused on human rights and social issues often do look globally and FIND ways to make a difference. =)

  • Pingback: The latest word game played by “pro-choice” activists