Opinion

Memorials for the unborn: do post-abortive families need places to grieve?

I used to live thirty minutes outside Washington, D.C. During that time I decided to take the Metrorail into the district to visit the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. When I walked through the exhibits, I was struck by haunting pictures of beautiful Jewish men, women, and children. I was stunned as I watched video clips of bodies being thrown into pits by the hundreds. My heart was heavy, and my soul grieved for the loss of millions of people I’d never met.

The Holocaust Museum provides more than a history lesson. It gives people a place to grieve the loss of precious lives. Names are remembered, survivor testimonies are told, and countless tears are shed. After leaving the museum, I felt numbed by mankind’s capacity for wickedness while empowered to stand against injustice in my day.

When we look at the issue of abortion, we see that the death toll is staggering. Some estimate that over 54 million babies have died from legalized abortion in the U.S alone. Unlike the Jews who died in WWII, the innocent children  killed in the womb leave behind no memories. In many cases, the only ones who remember the loss of a child are the parents who chose abortion. These parents can suffer feelings of great regret and shame long after their abortion.

The National Memorial for the Unborn, located in Chattanooga, Tennessee, is a place where parents come to mourn their deceased children. The memorial is built on a site that once held Chattanooga’s only abortion clinic. Over 35,000 babies were aborted on those grounds. On the property is a fifty-foot granite “Wall of Names” which is made up of brass plates with the names of children who have died. There is a “Remembrance Garden” and a Pool of Tears that is dedicated to the memory of babies lost through miscarriage.

Recently articles have been released about a new pro-life memorial that is proposed to be built in Wichita, Kansas. The World of Life Church has plans to build a “National Pro-life Memorial and International Life Center.” Blueprints for the memorial include a garden of crosses to represent the holocaust of the unborn, as well as a replica of the Wailing Wall found in Jerusalem.

Plans for the memorial have already stirred up controversy among Jewish leaders. Rabbi Micheal Davis of Congregation Emanu-El in Wichita has a problem with the proposal. He told the Daily Jewish Forward, “I see it as another example of a non-Jewish group taking a Jewish symbol and reinterpreting it for their own private use and thereby bastardizing it.”

Reaction to the memorial is premature, since the idea is only still a vision. The leader behind the memorial project is a controversial activist, and the proposed goal of raising 20-40 million dollars is unlikely to be met.

Even those in the pro-life community question the memorial. Popular writer Jill Stanek asked her readers:

I’m not sure this memorial will ever be built, or that Wichita is the right place for such a memorial, but nevertheless, is adding a Wailing Wall going too far? Is it right to co-opt a sacred Jewish site?

Most of the opposition towards the Wailing Wall memorial centers on the question of whether or not it’s offensive to use a Jewish landmark in reference to abortion. That is a serious question we should ponder. It’s important to stand against abortion while still being sensitive to those around us. A more general question I have is this: should there be more places for post-abortive families to grieve the loss of their children?

Across the nation there are a few sites, from a memorial for the unborn gravestone in a California cemetery to 350 crosses commemorating the loss of babies through abortion at the Cemetery of the Innocents at Clarion University in Clarion, PA. Are these memorials an important, necessary part of the healing process for those who have suffered loss through abortion?

In an article titled “Gift of Closure,” R.N Leslie T. Dean writes about her time at the Chattanooga Memorial for the unborn :

After I came to terms with what I had done, I found healing and peace. But I wanted finally to give “life” to the baby I had denied for so long. This memorial provided me with that opportunity. My baby now has a name, and I have closure — at last.

Later she states:

We may never know the impact that these memorials to the unborn have on the families of babies lost to abortion. Some have made decisions for Christ, some have restored their families, some have sought counseling for dysfunctional lifestyles, and some have turned from depression and thoughts of suicide to optimism and hope. There is no way to know how many people have been helped, but we do know that God knows and cares about every one of them.

I agree with Leslie. If memorials for the unborn provide places for regretful post-abortive families to mourn their children and gain closure, then perhaps we should have one in every state. What do you think?

Live Action on Facebook
  • http://www.facebook.com/robyn.arrington1 Robyn Arrington

    I think it’s a great idea for the families and for anyone who doesnt understand what they are doin when they abort their baby. It will show that the aborted baby is a person and deserves the same respect as a full term baby would get. Abortion is murder and this would show everyone that even though the baby is so small and you cant feel it doesnt mean its not a little person inside of you and it does have a heartbeat.

  • Christine

    Where in Ca is the headstone for the unborn?

  • Pingback: Memorials for the Unborn: Do Post-Abortive Families Need Places to Grieve? | Live Action News & Opinion | A mí, háblame en Cristiano

  • driveswift

    The comparison of abortion and the Holocaust is the most insensitive, most horrible thing the pro-life community uses in their argument. As the daughter of Jewish and Lutheran parents, I have sympathies with the christian argument here, but am wholly disgusted with the rhetoric claiming a woman’s right to choose whether to let a fetus develop in her womb is somehow similar to exterminating my people. It’s disingenuous hackery, at best, and pity-party politicking at it’s worst.

    • http://twitter.com/CalFreiburger Calvin Freiburger

      The Holocaust comparison is absolutely legitimate. The Holocaust killed 6 million by denying the human worth of Jews. Abortion has killed 50 million by denying the human worth of babies. Understanding what happens when we cheapen the sanctity of human life and try to define down any particular class of people should make someone more sympathetic to the pro-life cause, not less.

  • CarlisleMLH

    I think it would be more appropriate, effective, and worthwhile for the post-abortive parents spent their mourning/grief/passage-to-healing by helping to stop those considering abortion. Parents who have aborted their baby and now regret taking his/her life should give their voice for the child’s they took. “Closure”? I don’t think there should be closure! Good grieving and honest healing also seeks justice, seeks to prevent the repeating of such evil. Any memorial to those killed by abortion should show pictures of the slaughter babies. It should show the barbarity of the abortionist’s actions. It should show pictures of politicians who voted to keep this abomination legal. It should show the profits of Planned Parenthood and other abortuaries. A memorial to the aborted should be a place of horror. It should make everyone who comes there mourn and grieve for the evil we have perpetuated and/or tolerated. This sounds harsh. But as long as we allow the aborted to be invisible, too many people will fail to see their humanity.

    • Vmmiller1987

      I think you are way off. There are many women who have chosen abortion not knowing there where other options and were mislead to believe that the baby they were carrying was not a baby. Then when they found out the truth they regret their decision. They need the same closure of the death of the baby as someone who had a miscarriage. I have had an abortion at age 16 after being gang raped by 4 men. I didn’t know I had other options such as adoption and I was told by the clinic my baby wasn’t a baby. When I got pregnant with my now 5 yr old son, I went to a crisis pregnancy center and I learned the truth about a baby’s development in the womb. Had I known back then what I later found out I would never have made the descion to have an abortion. I can’t change what I did. But, I did need to grieve my loss and move one while celebrating my baby’s life in heaven with God. I hated myself when I found out the truth. I think that there should be a place to celebrate the eternal lives of the babies lost to abortion.

      • CarlisleMLH

        Thank you for sharing your story w/ me. I admit, it is very difficult for me to comprehend that anyone can be convinced they aren’t carrying a baby when they are pregnant. I’m not saying they can’t be lied to and made to believe the lie. I’m just saying it’s really hard for ME to understand. But I was very blessed to learn from my parents from a very young age that all people are precious and that people begin their lives at conception. How did it come about that you chose to go to a crisis pregnancy center? (Instead of elsewhere.) Did anyone encourage you to seek help there? (I’m wondering how more women might be reached before they turn to PP.) Again, thank you for sharing your experience. God bless you and your children.

  • Merle M. Mills

    In
    her book, Forgiven & Set Free, Linda Cochrane writes: “Depression
    may also result from feelings of sorrow and grief that go unrelieved because
    there is no place in our society to mourn the loss of an aborted child.” For years I like many women suffered in silence until I faced my unborn child and grieved uncontrollably. I believe the unseen grieving hearts for the precious unborn in each state speaks much much more than any memorial ever could.
    I am encouraged by your commitment to and your stand for life and the unborn.