Culture

Paterno, Planned Parenthood, and pedophiles: part 1

Football: an American past time. Anything truly American ought to be 100% free of any form of child abuse.

Guest post by Faith and Meredith Kuzma

American football: a career sport so prized it would have seemed impossible that anything could mar Penn State University’s winning legend. Yet recently Coach Paterno’s statue was removed from campus. The school received unprecedented penalties for the pedophile cover-up including a $60-million fine and a ban on post-season or bowl games. Even those who revere sports have a zero tolerance for pedophiles.

In fact, the cover-up of pedophile activity has been deemed so “egregious” that Penn State University received severe sanctions from the National Collegiate Athletic Association. In a recent PBS interview, NCAA President Mark Emmert said, “This is as systemic a cultural problem as it is a football problem.” Those telling words offer us a spotlight into the darker side of a sexual rights era – the covering up of the activity of pedophiles.

Americans adore their sports heroes and coaches, but common decency trumps a winning record, and esteem for a famed football program soon turned into repugnance for failed institutional integrity. Injustice of any kind is wrong, but Americans have a particular abhorrence for the sexual molestation of minors. So it is not surprising that our mainstream media – which is essentially television news as entertainment – can present such stories effectively. Television media relies on simple good-versus-bad narratives, and the school’s fifteen-year long protection of a pedophile is such an obvious wrong that they hit the story hard.

Not so obvious, apparently, is the equally stark narrative that is appearing as the dark shadow behind the currently popular phrase “reproductive rights.”

The mainstream media’s defensive line surrounding Planned Parenthood stems from its perceived historic role as the champion of the “reproductive rights” considered pivotal for guaranteeing women equal access to economic and political opportunities. Because feminists count abortion providers as essential for women’s career growth, Planned Parenthood is regarded as the home team. As such, the fortress mentality around issues of “reproductive rights” is evident as soon as you start asking questions: what is getting left out of the narrative? What goes unmentioned, downplayed, dismissed altogether?

For the most part, the media closes ranks with abortion providers, drawing the wagons in a circle around the abortion industry. Such a defensive strategy is beginning to crack open, however, as news sources reveal the ring of protection around pedophile activity. For instance, in an article calling attention to the most recent absence of mainstream coverage, Jill Stanek highlights the particular hypocrisy of the mainstream media’s quickness to expose pedophile cover-ups elsewhere while failing to pursue Planned Parenthood’s similar long-term cover-up of pedophile activity. The failure of effective political oversight of the abortion industry as well as a general media reluctance to expose the longstanding protection of pedophiles at Planned Parenthood shows the stronghold of “reproductive rights” thinking.

No one wants to be condemned as a racist or a sexist, and the complex linking of “reproductive rights” to basic civil rights fought for during the 1960s has led to a doctrine of free sexual expression for women. Drawing from the esteemed dogma of the Civil Rights era, these values have been extended to the abortion industry as abortion has come to stand in for hard-won “reproductive rights.” These “rights” rest on the assertion of what has become sexualityism – the theory that only when women are free to engage in sexual license, without the commitment that a long-term relationship to a man or child entails, will women be truly happy. This theory of women’s happiness has had nearly four decades since Roe v. Wade to show us results, and it is becoming increasingly evident that there is a consistent pattern showing an ongoing hugely detrimental effect.

In particular, the problematic nature of the abortion industry is seen in its apparent policy of silence regarding sexual abusers. Planned Parenthood has a well-documented history of protecting the perpetrators of sex crimes. For instance, they have covered up – by failing to report – the sexual abuse of minors (statutory rape) in Ohio, Arizona, and Indiana. Law enforcement officials understand that sexual predators will continue abuse if not reported – sometimes molesting a child for years or moving on to other victims. (See A Behavioral Analysis For Professionals Investigating the Sexual Exploitation of Children by Kenneth V. LanningOffice of Juvenile Justice, 2010.) As with other offenders, pedophiles repeatedly go unreported by Planned Parenthood.

Why? Why is Planned Parenthood protecting pedophiles?

Editor’s Note: Part 2 of this article will be released tomorrow with further details and analysis of Planned Parenthood’s cover-up of pedophiles.

Live Action on Facebook
  • Richard

    Before you jump to “details and analysis” you should provide some actual, I dunno, *evidence*. Just because you can form a sentence with the words “Planned Parenthood” and “pedophile” and “long term cover-up” doesn’t actually make it suddenly to be true.

    Not sure why you’re dragging Penn State into this muck. As far as I know, none of Jerry Sandusky’s victims were take to Planned Parenthood, although given the number of partners the coach had, I would recommend they stop in to get checked for STD’s.

    • just someone

      FYI for future reference: Jerry Sandusky didn’t have “partners.” He had victims.

    • LoveTheLeast8

      This article directly links to the evidence. Do watch it yourself and see all the Planned Parenthood staffers saying they won’t report child sex-abuse cases. The author did the work, you just failed to read it.

    • LoveTheLeast8

      To make it easy for you. Start with these:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMlrAj4v4J4

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Daniel-Durham/100002906757423 Daniel Durham

      The point was that even ardent football worhippers condemned Sandusky, and they should do the same thing to PP

  • peach

    If a ten year old girl is raped by a 50 year old man, for example, and she becomes pregnant, you’re the one who wants to see that girl carry that pregnancy and give birth. Now I’m not saying you’re as bad as the pedophile, but you’re pretty sick yourself.

    • PeachyIssues

      It’s sick to prevent further trauma and harm to the poor girl? To allow her a chance to not have her reproductive organs harmed? Come on Peach, two wrongs don’t make a right.

      • Solntsye

        But pregnancy and delivery are traumatic as well, especially to a very young girl who is no more than a child herself.

        While I realize the baby who is on the way is not guilty for the crimes of his/her father, it is not right to downplay pregnancy and delivery- especially in the case of rape/incest. Don’t kid yourself, pregnancy and delivery are life-changing, and their effects last for your lifetime…not just nine months.

        While I hope that raped women/girls could be strong enough (and willing enough) to go through everything pregnancy/delivery entails (and accept all those permanent changes that come with it) for the sake of the unborn baby, I can not bring myself to take the raped victim’s autonomy, just as her attacker did.

    • http://twitter.com/CalFreiburger Calvin Freiburger

      But there’s nothing sick at all about the death your preferred option would cause…..

  • BLAH

    When it comes to covering up pedophilia you show me Planned Parenthood and I’ll raise you the Catholic Church.

  • Pingback: Paterno, Planned Parenthood, and Pedophiles: Part 2

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tim-Berton/100002814677581 Tim Berton

    The media jumped on Paterno because he was famous. The real culprits are the District Attorney, Ray Gricar, and PA Dept. of Public Welfare investigator, Jerry Lauro who knew Sandusky hugged Second Mile boys in the showers in 1998 and did nothing to stop him. He was convicted for that 1998 offense in 2012.

    Jerry Lauro could, and should, have banned Sandusky from contact with Second Mile boys in 1998 and launched a wider investigation to interview all the boys Sandusky fostered or mentored over many years.

    That’s just not as good a story because Lauro was just a professional investigator of child sex abuse, not a famous football coach like Paterno.

  • Pingback: Paterno, Planned Parenthood, and Pedophiles: Part 1