Politics

Personhood challenges nationally legalized abortion at the U.S. Supreme Court

This week, Personhood USA’s state affiliate in Oklahoma delivered an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States which has the potential to overturn the infamous Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey decisions.

Earlier this summer, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma wrote an ill-argued decision against the state Personhood ballot initiative, thus denying Oklahoma voters their right to decide the issue and petition-circulators their right to petition the government. The State Supreme Court’s action in striking down the initiative – before it had even been voted upon – was a case of overreach in judicial review that provided a golden opportunity for appeal.

The appeal, dubbed Personhood Oklahoma v. Barber, et al., will call for redress of Oklahomans’ First and Tenth Amendment rights. ”This is about the fundamental rights of people in a state to decide for themselves what the law in their state should be,” said Steve Crampton, the attorney from Liberty Counsel who represents Personhood Oklahoma.

In his Casey dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia underscored the right of citizens to vote on the issue:

The permissibility of abortion, and the limitations upon it, are to be resolved like most important questions in our democracy: by citizens trying to persuade one another and then voting.

Personhood USA legal analyst Gualberto Garcia Jones believes that denying this democratic decision-making opportunity exposes a chink in abortion’s judicial armor. “The undue burden of the standard of Casey is completely unworkable,” he explains. “With such a vague standard and any variety of interpretations, it is impossible for citizens to understand it and apply it.”

Over the past three years, Personhood has surprised many by surpassing expectations of how many people would vote for a total ban on abortion. Since then, the movement has steadily built support from voters, Republican candidates, and pro-life groups. Now Liberty Counsel and Personhood Oklahoma are taking a major step forward for the pro-life movement by creating a new challenge at the U.S. Supreme Court – giving the nation’s highest court a chance to reverse nationally legalized abortion.

“Our mission is obedience to Christ and defending the lives of all innocent children,” Keith Mason, president of Personhood USA, told supporters. ”The ‘end goal’ has never been to get a case before the U.S. Supreme Court, or to overturn Roe, because it is often argued that such actions are not necessary to end abortion.” However, Mason believes that this appeal “has taken us straight to the heart of the battle, fast-forwarding several years.”

“Regardless of the outcome of this case, Personhood has proven itself effective in its methods and strategy, not only by saving lives, but by legally being the first to bring a legitimate, direct legal challenge to Planned Parenthood v. Casey,” Mason added.

If the recent Supreme Court decision on the Affordable Care Act teaches us anything, it is that the Court is unpredictable. Justices made their decisions for reasons few could have expected. Instead of worrying, hand-wringing, and making prognostications about how the nation’s highest court will vote, Personhood USA will continue striving to protect the pre-born by love and by law. For pro-life Oklahomans, it’s never the wrong time to do the right thing.

Live Action on Facebook
  • Pingback: Personhood Challenges Nationally Legalized Abortion at the U.S. Supreme Court | Live Action News & Opinion | A mí, háblame en Cristiano

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Darul-Vietii-Bucuresti/100002059190450 Darul Vietii Bucuresti

    Excellent action and news in the context of intense attacks on the culture of life! Thank you, Personhood USA team and volunteers!

  • http://twitter.com/StevenErtelt Steven Ertelt

    “Personhood has proven itself effective in its methods and strategy, not only
    by saving lives.”

    No it hasn’t, personhood amendments have lost in each state that has voted on
    them and wouldn’t ban abortions even if they had won at the ballot. It hasn’t
    saved a single life and likely won’t.

    • BCSWowbagger

      You mean like the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act, Mr. Ertelt?

      I wondered why LifeNews has done such a poor job covering Personhood proposals, mentioning them only when they are defeated or fail to advance. I see now that it was deliberate. That is unfortunate, since LN’s mission statement claims that it is devoted to “reporting news that affects the pro-life community” — presumably without prejudice. You do a disservice to your readers by presenting a consciously biased perspective on the pro-life cause. You should instead use what little influence God has given you to fully inform pro-lifers of the events on the ground… even when you’re not very pleased about the actions of others within your movement.

      My (qualified) defense of (some) Personhood amendments can be read here: http://bit.ly/QRlKH4

    • http://twitter.com/dreadhelm Josh Craddock

      Hey Steve, since you don’t like personhood…

      1. What legal language do you propose to end all baby-murder in your State?

      2. What is your plan to implement this language?

      3. How may we help you with that?

      Until then, either lead, help, or get out of the way.

    • Kristiburtonbrown

      We need unity in our pro-life movement. I’m obviously not the first or the only one to say that, but really, I think we ought to all appreciate the work that others are doing and stop arguing about which strategy is going to end abortion. I mean really, have any of us ended it yet? Nope. So let’s all work on the strategy we believe is best and stop talking negatively about each other.

      And, Steven, I don’t mean this comment just to you. I mean it to all sides of the pro-life movement. We all need to take a step back, stop infighting and critiquing each other, and press on to end abortion. In the end, it’s going to be a cumulative effort (and God’s work) that ends abortion – not one specific strategy, imho.

      Are some strategies better than others? Yes. Are we ever all going to have the exact same opinion on that? Likely not. So let’s stop trying to convince each other and get on with the real business at hand. Also, while I do not believe that Personhood is the only pro-life strategy, I have been deeply involved in it and I know for a fact that it has indeed saved lives – even while it’s lost on the ballots.