Opinion

Some thoughts on friendship between pro-lifers and pro-choicers

Can pro-lifers and pro-choicers truly be friends, given the deep, irreconcilable differences between their principles and worldviews? I recently came across the question in an episode of Life Report from a few months back, and it strikes me as important enough to reopen for discussion.

On one level, the question may seem strange, since we normally don’t think of political disagreement as trumping the bonds we form through personal experience, our basic dignity as human beings, or the core values we share as Americans. For the most part, we understand that good people can come to different conclusions on many issues, and we consider it a virtue to elevate brotherhood and harmony above partisanship.

But the conundrum arises because abortion isn’t just one policy issue among many. It is not merely mistaken or counterproductive; it is evil. Abortion is the murder of the innocent, a moral crime whose evil is matched only by slavery in the record of America’s sins. So it can’t be confronted without raising uncomfortable questions about the character of those who support it.

Can good people do evil? And can good people associate with those who do evil?

While the horror of abortion can’t be overstated, there are multiple caveats pro-lifers must consider.

First, it’s possible for good people to unintentionally fall for bad information and deceptive logic. As we regularly discuss here at Live Action, there are many in government, media, academia, and popular culture who for years have saturated our society with lies, distortions, and fallacies about everything from whether the unborn are human and what “person” means to the alleged dangers and ineffectiveness of changing the status quo. Those who have trusted the wrong source too readily or failed to investigate the issue sufficiently are guilty of negligence, but not necessarily of malice.

Second, many find their judgment colored by harrowing personal experiences, be it their own past abortion or a loved one who died in childbirth. The pain and difficulty of coming to terms with such experiences can’t be ignored.

Third, abortion isn’t going to end until enough minds are changed, and we can’t change minds if we just cut ourselves off from everyone who’s not yet on board. Indeed, when it comes to Jane Roe herself, Norma McCorvey recalls how the persistent, humble openness of Operation Rescue’s Flip Benham was a key component of her conversion:

Occasionally, the clashes would collapse into conversation. During one friendly banter, I goaded Flip, “What you need is to go to a good Beach Boys concert.” Flip answered, “Miss Norma, I haven’t been to a Beach Boys concert since 1976.” The seemingly innocuous response shook me to the core. All at once, Flip became human to me.

Before, I had thought of Flip as a man who did nothing but yell at abortion clinics and read his Bible. In fact, I even pictured him sleeping with his hands across his chest, Dracula-like, with a big Bible tucked under his arms. The thought that he was a real person–a guy who had once even gone to a Beach Boys concert–never occurred to me. Now that it had, I saw him in a new light.

I continued the teasing. “Come on, Flip, I didn’t know you were ever a sinner.” “Miss Norma,” Flip said, “I’m a great big sinner, saved by a great big God.” Of all the things I expected Flip to say, this wasn’t one of them. I didn’t like to think of Flip as human.

But this “unreal” Flip was telling me that he was a sinner, that he had even gone to a Beach Boys concert! I couldn’t connect that with the “fanatics” I had made the rescuers out to be; and it took a while for me to look past the confrontational tactics for which Flip was known. As we chatted outside on the bench between our offices, however, Flip began sharing some stories of his past and out of this vulnerability an unlikely friendship was born.

On the other hand, as the Life Report team explains, pro-lifers cannot be indifferent toward their friends’ pro-choice sympathies, and cannot give the impression that it’s okay for anyone to support legal abortion. Even when it’s uncomfortable to do so, we must be honest and clear about the harm they do by opposing the rights of the unborn, and do what we can to change their minds.

Taking all of the above into account, it seems to me the best way to reconcile friendship and abortion is by drawing a single line: on one side, pro-choicers sincerely trying to do the right thing and honestly struggling with a particular aspect of the debate; on the other, those who simply don’t care about the truth and fallout of their position.

What do you think?

Live Action on Facebook
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ashley-Newman/1557146137 Ashley Newman

    You are so right! Of the pro-chiocers I am friends with, most have never really thought about their position; they are simply parroting what the world tells them OR they have had or know somone that has had a bad birth or adoption experience. Once they are shown the humanity of these little babies and their miraculous early fetal development, it makes them very uncomfortable. As I heard on Sunday, “Truth is true for everyone, whether you want to believe it or not.”

  • Strident Feminist Bitch

    Don’t worry, I would never be friends with anyone who has no respect for my basic bodily sovereignty.

    • http://twitter.com/CalFreiburger Calvin Freiburger

      So can you have any degree of respect or understanding for those sincerely concerned about the harm they believe is being done to innocent babies?

      You’ll save yourself a lot of unnecessary stress, frustration, and hostility in life if you realize that the abortion debate concerns something other than your “basic bodily sovereignty.

  • Josephine

    I’ve talked to pro-choicers online before and I’d say most of them are friendly people(there was one girl who hated children, but she had emotional and psychological issues, so…), and that they just repeat the general one-liners about “choice.” I’d like to think that they’ll change one day(hopefully not the hard way), and we’ll get along even better.

  • ProTruth2

    How often, in real life, are the righteous confronted with the crisis of evil-doers and evil-thinkers trying to foist friendship onto them? I imagine that if pro-lifers inveigh against their pro-choice acquaintances’ wickedness long enough, the problem will resolve itself.

  • Shelley

    If they were all like you, I can be quite certain that I wouldn’t consider any alleged “pro-lifers” friends. As it stands, I do have a few of them, and have actually had productive, civil conversations on the subject. It certainly is possible, unless either person is overly condescending and arrogant about it…

    • http://twitter.com/CalFreiburger Calvin Freiburger

      “unless either person is overly condescending and arrogant about it…”

      Bingo.

      • Shelley

        I’m so glad we agree! ;-)

  • LEugene

    So basically, yes, it’s okay for my pro-life friends to still hang out with me, but only for the sole purpose of trying to get me to see things their way? I’m sorry, but that is still not true friendship. That’s like having a Christian friend who constantly tells me I’m going to burn in Hell because my ancestors allegedly killed Jesus. Way to accept me for who I am. -_-

    I believe what I believe. If you can’t accept that, you’re not my friend. Friends don’t try to use each other for their own political agendas or try to force the other to change their mind about something. Don’t become a person’s friend just so that you can change them. That’s like a woman who marries a smoking, drinking bad-boy with the idea that he’ll “come around eventually”.

    Being pro-choice does NOT mean pro-death. There are people in this world who would jump off a cliff if it was made illegal, just to prove the point. Being pro-choice isn’t being evil. It’s giving others a chance to do what their beliefs and opinions lead them to do of their own volition. You can’t twist a person’s arm into doing something or not doing something and expect them to like it.

    Above all else, that is not something “friends” do. Nowhere in a true, caring relationship is included the idea that friends have to think alike or support the same politicians or even share the same religion. Don’t even think that by following this article’s advice, you’ll be a true friend.

    *Scolds self for even bothering to comment*

    • http://twitter.com/CalFreiburger Calvin Freiburger

      “but only for the sole purpose of trying to get me to see things their way”

      “Friends don’t try to use each other for their own political agendas or
      try to force the other to change their mind about something. Don’t
      become a person’s friend just so that you can change them.”

      These aren’t accurate representations of my article. In it, I make clear that the primary deciding criteria are whether the particular pro-choice friend is well-intentioned and sincere, or uncaring and dishonest. The importance of changing people’s minds is simply noted as a warning about why we shouldn’t prematurely cut ourselves off from others over disagreements.

      “That’s like having a Christian friend who constantly tells me I’m going
      to burn in Hell because my ancestors allegedly killed Jesus. Way to
      accept me for who I am.”

      Um, no. There’s no equivalence whatsoever between judging YOUR action (rightly or wrongly) and blaming you for an ancestor’s alleged act. Nor is judging what you do equivalent to judging who you are.

      “Being pro-choice does NOT mean pro-death.”

      Sorry, but that’s exactly what it means. You are in favor of allowing the choice to inflict death on a certain group of innocent people. That’s my whole point: if a particular belief is in something that hurts *others*, it’s by definition not “personal.”

    • Babylover

      If someone is letting his/her “friend” go astray (like letting him/her do drugs and be an alcoholic with no intervention), that person doesn’t care about the well being of
      his/her “friend”, and therefore cannot be called such. It is the same
      with abortion. We, the friends of “pro-choicers”, are truly obliged to
      help those individuals who believe that abortion is right by showing
      them the true path. So thus, helping people see the truth in abortion is
      understood in the definition of “friend”.

      P.S. I just want you to know that abortion is just as much as an ethical
      issue as murder is. In other words, it is not political, but moral.
      (just want to give you something to think about)

      • LifeofPi

        If you constantly try to “show” your friends the true path you are going to end up driving them away.

    • Guest

      Very true.

  • http://twitter.com/tbogg TBogg

    I think I would have trouble finding common ground with a creepy repressed little panty sniffer like yourself.

    • http://twitter.com/CalFreiburger Calvin Freiburger

      Have I ever mentioned how impressed I am by pro-choicers’ commitment to honesty, civility, and fairness?

  • Detroiter327

    I personally find it odd anyone would take such a singular line on this issue, and pigeon hole both sides so blatantly. For the majority of people pro choice or pro life is not an all or nothing issue, there are many shades of gray. I have plenty of friends who are pro life, and at the end of the day we all agree to disagree. They realize at the end of the day I cannot be convinced that a two week old fetus can have rights (or their rights trump those of an adult) and I realize that I cannot convince them of my point. We debate more on the semantics really, and then set the issue aside and move on.. Everyone who I have had a debate with in the wild (off the internet) has been civil and intrigued, as I am in their position. Its possible to have interesting and intellectual debates without using the word evil repeatedly or attempting to change someones P.O.V. My views on organized religion have been swayed (in a positive way) over the years by compassionate, intelligent people who didnt have to draw a line in the sand. The best ambassadors for any cause never do. Drawing such a line could do nothing but isolate, put someone on the defense, and be damaging to whatever is trying to be communicated.

    • http://twitter.com/CalFreiburger Calvin Freiburger

      Where’s the pigeonholing? I acknowledged that there are understandable reasons why well-meaning people could be pro-choice. But if the act itself really is evil, there’s no dancing around that fact. Pretending evil isn’t evil does more harm than good in the long run, and it’s not being honest to sanitize one’s understanding of abortion simply to spare their sensibilities.

      Let’s say you had a friend who, for whatever reason, supported something you knew to be truly evil. You see the awfulness and harm of his position, but your relationship to him also shows you he has a good side, and that his wrong view is due to misinformation, or pervasive indoctrination in his upbringing, or harrowing experiences that skewed his perspective on the subject. How would you respond? What kind of balance would you try to strike between friendly compassion and moral clarity?

  • http://twitter.com/expositorium Expositorium

    There was only ever one good person. And we killed him. A good thing to remember in order for us to keep pride in check.

  • Mr. Centrist

    I have friends who picket abortion clinics and friends who have worked in them. I am always open about my opposition to abortion with my pro-choice friends, and I’m always willing to challenge my pro-life friends on their sometimes superficial approach to the difficulties that lead women to choose abortion. Personally, I don’t think making abortion illegal will solve anything — we’ve also outlawed slavery, unjust war and torture worldwide, and I haven’t seen the go away. The only thing that ever lasts is what the heart believes. I always try to touch someone’s heart on the abortion issue and have talked more than one woman out of it. I think strong, caring, love, including practical assistance is the only way to defeat abortion. And I would never choose my friends based on their politics only on their sincerity.

  • Rebecca Downs

    I generally do agree with this argument, and because of a specific example I have.

    One of my best friends, who will be a bridesmaid at my wedding someday (just to give you an idea of how close we are) is very pro-choice. She knows that I am pro-life. We don’t actually talk much about the issue because we both understand and respect how the other person feels. I believe in my heart that what she believes is wrong, and maybe even has roots of evil, but I feel this just about her beliefs, not about her. It is certainly a flaw I see in her, but I am not perfect either and I don’t expect my friends to be perfect. I certainly do hope that one day she will change her mind and I hope that I my serving as an example may help her to do so sometime whenever that may be.

    My roommate during my sophomore year in college, who I still speak to, is probably one of the most pro-choice people I know. We have gotten into some bickering over it and since I know it is unlikely she will change her mind anytime soon and she knows I am very passionate about it, we try not to bring the issue up so much with each other.

    Then I have another friend who is extremely pro-choice. She is also a liberal feminist. We have been on the opposite side of this issue since we knew each other. After I started posting pro-life articles, links, quotes, etc thanks to AbolishAbortion and my own postings, she decided I posted too many pro-life things and deleted me from Facebook.

    Now while I am sad I may have lost a friend or even a few over this, my main issue and passion, even my career, in life is to be pro-life and fight for the cause. I will not give that up for anyone, not even a friend. So if someone doesn’t want to be friends with me or associate with me because I am pro-life, so be it then. This cause of truth and justice isn’t meant to be easy.

  • Rebecca Downs

    I was just thinking about this again… here’s my stance on pro-choice friends, acquaintances, strangers, public figures, etc. We are all flawed, imperfect and sinning human beings. But someone who is pro-choice has a big personality flaw in my mind. Just saying. I won’t refuse to be friends with them (see my other response below this) but I just think that’s one flaw they have; I certainly have my own. I’ve done research on this woman Frederica Aalto, who does great stuff otherwise in her international and advocacy work. But the fact that she has served on the Board for Planned Parenthood unfortunately is too much for me to overlook. Hope that makes sense.

  • Pingback: The Case Against Nice