Analysis

The GOP platform on abortion: what does it actually say?

Much emphasis has been placed on abortion this election season, and the official GOP and Democratic positions on the issue are quite opposite. We have one party who thinks it is a right and should be funded with taxpayer dollars and one party who is seeking to protect the unborn.

Here is a look at what the 2012 GOP’s platform has to say on the abortion issue.

The GOP’s platform is outspoken in its concern for the protection of life, without the use of federal funds:

We call on the government to permanently ban all federal funding and subsidies for abortion and healthcare plans that include abortion coverage.

The difference is drawn between abortion under ObamaCare and the need to protect life:

Through Obamacare, the current Administration has promoted the notion of abortion as healthcare. We, however, affirm the dignity of women by protecting the sanctity of human life. Numerous studies have shown that abortion endangers the health and well-being of women, and we stand firmly against it.

The platform addresses Obama’s agenda regarding religion:

The most offensive instance of this war on religion has been the current Administration’s attempt to compel faith-related institutions, as well as believing individuals, to contravene their deeply held religious, moral, or ethical beliefs regarding health services, traditional marriage, or abortion.

The need for wider protection for the unborn is voiced:

Republican leadership has led the effort to prohibit the barbaric practice of partial-birth abortion and permitted States to extend health care coverage to children before birth. We urge Congress to strengthen the Born Alive Infant Protection Act by enacting appropriate civil and criminal penalties on healthcare providers who fail to provide treatment and care to an infant who survives an abortion, including early induction delivery where the death of the infant is intended. We call for legislation to ban sex-selective abortions – gender discrimination in its most lethal form – and to protect from abortion unborn children who are capable of feeling pain; and we applaud U.S. House Republicans for leading the effort to protect the lives of pain-capable unborn children in the District of Columbia. We call for a ban on the use of body parts from aborted fetuses for research. We support and applaud adult stem cell research to develop lifesaving therapies, and we oppose the killing of embryos for their stem cells. We oppose federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.

Live Action on Facebook
  • PD

    would it be untrue to say “If god wanted abortion to be illegal, then he would have appointed the right lawmakers to make it illegal.”?

    • Teyla

      No necessarily. God gave us free will. We as a nation have decided to go against God.

      • PD

        how the hell can you even presume to know what god wants? that is a ridiculous claim.

        • Suzanne

          The 10 Commandments PD.

        • Legomyeggo

          We hold that God has handed to us the revelation of his nature, and that it is described in the Bible. Not enough space in these comments to go over the reasons for which we believe this, but I assure you it is *not* mere, blind, reasonless faith. So if it is the case that the Bible is at least a decently accurate revelation of God’s nature, then we can say what God loves–or hates–because it is found in the Bible, His self-revelation.