Media Bias

The media battleground

Jon Stewart, The Daily Show

A couple weeks ago, after the House voted to defund Planned Parenthood, I found myself on my couch late one evening, half-working and half-watching a rerun of “The Daily Show.” The lead-off segment was about the PP bill, and Jon Stewart, with the help of Daily Show correspondent Kristen Schaal, proceeded to satirically skewer the House’s decision and its supporters.

How did they do this? By providing a biting yet cogent refutation of the bill’s argument? By looking soberly at both sides and presenting a humorous yet fair analysis?

No. They did it by being completely dismissive of the pro-life argument, acting as though it were not even worth considering a ludicrous ideology that clearly was born out of a desire to deny women access to “convenient’ health care. In fact, the title of the segment was “Motherf#@kers,” in reference to the imaginary motive of pro-lifers: harming women. They did not even come close to accurately representing the opposing argument.

“Among flippant people,” said C.S. Lewis, “the Joke is always assumed to have been made. No one actually makes it; but every serious subject is discussed in a manner which implies that they have already found a ridiculous side to it.”

In this way, the Daily Show writers and comedians, like many others in the media and especially in comedy, dismissed the whole idea of denying federal funds for abortion without actually having to make an argument. All they had to do was act as though it were already obvious that it was a ridiculous idea, and the audience – many of them – nodded in agreement, enjoying that smug sense of self-satisfaction that comes with knowing they have the “right” idea, just like Jon Stewart, when in fact they don’t have any idea whatsoever.

Sure, “The Daily Show” is a comedy. It’s supposed to be entertaining. But it is also a major source of political commentary in our culture. Last year’s Rally to Restore Sanity, Stewart and Stephen Colbert’s “moderate alternative” to the Tea Parties, was supposed to call for a return to centrism and reason and fairness and open dialogue. But there is nothing fair about the way the argument against Planned Parenthood was treated by Stewart and his show.

Flippancy is not the only tool the popular media uses to discredit pro-lifers by making us look like a deranged group of violent, zealous lunatics. For example, this past January the Catholic Pro-Life Committee of Dallas, in cooperation with many pro-life organizations, held its annual downtown Roe v. Wade memorial activities, including the March for Life. Of course, the big march every year is in D.C., but in Dallas we feel a special obligation to demonstrate on that day, considering the original suit leading to the Roe decision was filed in the courthouse to which we march every year.

There were several thousand people at the march and rally holding several thousand pro-life signs. I saw many that were religious, some that were challenging, a few that were a little weird, but only one did I find to be truly bizarre. Someone had fastened a baby doll to a piece of poster board, and words – no idea what they meant –  were scrawled on the sign in Spanish.

The next day, the Dallas Morning News story on the march featured a giant photo of – you guessed it – the crucified baby doll, replete with a headline reading: “Hundreds March for Life Downtown.” Hundreds. Not thousands. Deliberately misleading? As Sarah Palin would say, “You betcha.” And she knows a thing or two about bad press.

From dismissing us as nutcases to misrepresenting our motives – as in a recent blog by a Dallas Observer writer who claimed the pro-life cause is an elaborate excuse to engage in “slut-shaming” – we are continuously misrepresented and ridiculed by those who don’t even bother to learn what we’re about. I used to do it myself. I was what I call a “Sure Why Not?” pro-choicer. I thought it just kind of came with the territory of being a young, hip, intelligent woman. This is what G.K. Chesterton called “the degrading slavery of being a child of [ones] age.” I had no idea, as most people don’t, what an abortion was, what it did, or what was its miserable aftermath, but I nonetheless proclaimed loudly all the talking points about why “a woman’s right to choose” was as sacred as… actually I don’t think I believed in the sacred at the time. (That was my first problem.)

So how do we combat these injustices? Largely, by doing what we’re already doing: using the media to speak the truth whenever and wherever we can. If you’re not using Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, Blogger, and more, to disseminate the truth about abortion, you can start today for free. Do it with intelligence and class and humor and grace. Show them we’re not morons, lunatics, or mean-spirited woman-haters. Avoid flame wars and endless, counterproductive arguments with those who are inflammatory and hateful. Like Jonah Goldberg said, “Don’t wrestle in the mud with pigs. You get dirty and the pig likes it.”

But be unafraid. You have nothing to fear from the truth. So you may lose a few Facebook friends. You’ll give them something to think about before they click “Delete,” and you never know when that tiny seed you planted will grow and blossom into a converted soul, profound healing, or even a single, miraculous, human life.

As an actor and entertainer who works for a live music company, I often wonder if I have not damaged professional relationships. We don’t speak about politics or religion in the workplace, but I am anything but shy about voicing my opinion on Facebook. I’m sure I work with people who disagree with me, and it’s quite possible I have lost opportunities due to my beliefs. I may never know. But I will never stop. “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter” said Dr. King.

Keep talking about and acting on the things that matter. In the end, truth will prevail.

Live Action on Facebook
  • Pingback: Must Know Headlines 3.6.2011 — ExposeTheMedia.com

  • paul_macintosh

    This is a great point about flippancy. I totally agree that the issue is way too important to be treated with flippancy.

    However, I thought the Jon Stewart clip was intelligent and hilarious, not flippant. Thanks for posting it here! I would've missed it otherwise. It sounds like perhaps you misunderstood Stewart's argument — I'll break it down here:

    The title, "Motherf___ers," isn't making fun of pro-life people wanting to harm women, it's making fun of the Republican reasoning for de-funding services that provide care to mothers like the over $700 million they're taking away from the WIC program. Don't you agree that it's pretty ironic that the same people who are trying to argue that we should force all women to have babies is also trying to take away services that help those women care for their babies? This is the irony of the Republican argument that Stewart highlighted intelligently and effectively. He's not attacking the pro-life side, he's attacking the Republican reasoning for why they want to both force women to carry babies to term and then cut back on all the services that help them care for those babies after they're born. He's saying it doesn't make sense for Republicans to say they value life so much they want to force women into being mothers, when they turn around and cut back on all the services that let women care effectively for their kids.

    The line "that's so pro-life, even if it kills you" was pretty great. Don't you agree that it's a bit silly to allow hospitals to deny women abortions even if it'll kill them? Isn't that just a little bit unreasonable, given your reasoning that human life is sacred?

    By saying that PP doesn't make money on abortions but on concessions, Stewart is highlighting the extreme and unreasonable nature of the anti-PP argument that PP is only in it for the money. He's basically saying if PP only wanted to make a profit, they could charge for all sorts of other things (like snacks and popcorn!).

    In reality, what happens is women travel to PP from far away places and often PP workers like my wife volunteer to have the women stay in our homes overnight while they recover or prepare for the abortion. We feed them and donate food to them. We treat them with respect and talk to them about their lives. We could be charging them a fee for this, but we don't. Why not? Because we're not in this business for the money.

    The joke about abortions being so convenient that some women who have them aren't even pregnant is hilarious and very smart. The reason it's smart is that it highlights the unreasonableness behind the argument that it's scary how convenient Planned Parenthood is. What would be the point of trying to make a service inaccessible? What clinic or health service is going to try to make itself as inconvenient as possible to get to, particularly for low income women who might not have cars? The point of PP is to offer ACCESSIBLE Pap smears, HIV tests, vasectomies, tampons, etc. How is it a bad thing for PP to be conveniently located? It's ludicrous to say that women are just "stopping in" for an abortion, which is a painful and involved procedure, and Stewart cleverly highlights the unreasonableness of this argument in his satire.

    Most intelligently of all, he highlights how silly it is that the C-span speaker made a distinction between "technically true" and "true." Federal funds do not go towards abortion — end of story. It's unconstitutional to punish PP for services they provide that DON'T get federally funded, by removing all their federal funds. And it's a slippery slope argument–should we de-fund anything remotely associated with abortion? Should we not give medicaid to any women who have had abortions? We probably shouldn't let women who've had abortions access their retirement savings. We probably shouldn't fund police officers and firemen to save the lives of women who've had abortions. All this is federal funds! Let's make sure we de-fund anything indirectly associated with abortion.

  • Kristen

    You’re probably a PP operative or something but that’s ok. I’ll go ahead and talk to you just long enough to say No, I dont think it’s “ironic” because PP is not in the business if helping women. That is not their mission. Their clearly stated mission is population control. Their preferred method, because it makes them money, is abortion. If they accidentally and inadvertently on occasion help a woman, it’s not because they intended to, nor does it matter. Ted Bundy may have worked in a soup kitchen twice a week. He was still an evil, murderous monster. And furthermore I am not sure you thoroughly grasped Stewart’s tone or the intent of the Daily Show segment. Very sweet of you to explain the “point” of it to me, as though I were too dumb to get it. It doesn’t surprise me that you didn’t find it offensive or dismissive of the prolife movement because you are not prolife.
    Also, this argument about how PP does not get money for abortions is starting to make me very tired. It is patently obvious that giving them money for tongue depressors and flavored condoms or whatever frees up more money for committing abortions.
    Your contention that PP is not in this for the money almost made me spit iced tea all over the screen. For someone who has no problem encouraging women to kill their babies, you are remarkably naive. I’m not gonna reply to you anymore in this comments section because I have a strict one reply policy to keep me from wasting time in flame wars. So have at it. But you and your wife are not helping those women. You are facilitating murder. Sooner or later you will realize that. For the sake of many women and children and your own immortal soul, I pray it is sooner rather than later.

    • paul_macintosh

      Kristen, thanks for your response. Sorry if my response sounded patronizing, I didn't mean it that way at all.

      You say "their clearly stated mission is population control." This appears nowhere on the PP website and nowhere on any PP written material and no PP official has ever mentioned this mission. Therefore, it is not their "clearly stated mission." Their mission is here, which I encourage you to check out: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/who-we-

      "If they accidentally and inadvertently on occasion help a woman"

      Well, 97% of their services go towards women's health services, not abortion. Is that an accidental 97%? It's definitely not an "on occasion" situation. 97% of the work that they do helps women. 3% is abortion. I really don't understand how you can argue that if they help women it's just an accident.

      "It is patently obvious that giving them money for tongue depressors and flavored condoms or whatever frees up more money for committing abortions."

      This is actually not obvious. Why? Because they charge for abortions. Like you said yourself, they're in the business for profit. Therefore they charge for abortions. Therefore giving out condoms using federal funds doesn't free up funds for abortions. Because PP doesn't pay for the abortions. The women pay for the abortions themselves. Like you said. The ONLY thing federal funds frees up funds for is more condoms. Oh yeah, and vasectomies, HIV tests, Pap smears, tampons, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.

      You say that I am facilitating murder. However, you are part of a movement that wants to legalize the murder of abortion providers. I'm not sure whether you personally agree with that bill they're trying to pass. But the pro-life people who are trying to pass that bill are LITERALLY facilitating murder. They're literally making murder legal.

      • livewell8

        The pro-life movement isn't trying to "legalize the murder of abortion providers". Smears like that is basically hate speech.

        • paul_macintosh

          How is it hate speech if it's true? I certainly wish it wasn't true but I'm as shocked and outraged as you seem to be about this bill: http://legis.state.sd.us/sessions/2011/Bill.aspx?…

          I'm not sure how you can say that this bill, which technically makes killing an abortion provider a justifiable homicide, is not technically making killing an abortion provider a justifiable homicide.

          I have been nothing but respectful in my posts on this site, and I don't see how anyone can reasonably argue otherwise.

          • livewell8

            You are assuming the position of others which is highly offensive.

            What is one pro-life group pushing this bill?

          • paul_macintosh

            I wasn't assuming at all. If you read my original post, I said "I'm not sure whether you personally agree with the bill…"

            Americans United for Life and Family First support the same bill which is being put forward in Nebraska.

          • livewell8

            AUL specifically says that they do not support any violence. They also say that their bill clearly only referrers to defending an unborn child from ILLEGAL acts. An abortion is legal. I don't get the issue. The SD bill (which I haven't read) I guess was vague. That isn't good and it was killed. No legit groups support violence. That's fear-mongering to say that is a goal.

          • paul_macintosh

            That's a good point. I suppose I am just skeptical of people's real motivations behind proposing bills like these, given that there is not only a constant stream of threats of physical violence to my wife's office, but also to my personal home. Pro-life activists have taken it upon themselves to find out where me and my wife live, and they have called my home and threatened me and my family. And the fact that there have been 8 murders in the last 20 years of abortion providers, not to mention hundreds of arson and bombing attempts, doesn't make me feel any better about the idea that these are just empty words coming my way. It certainly doesn't lead me to believe that the pro-life activists who are threatening my family are not supporting bills like these. But like you said, that's not you, and I apologize for lumping you in with the people who call my home.

            I suppose that I am confused by what the pro-life movement chooses to focus on, particularly Live Action. It seems like this would be a wonderful platform to use to support efforts to stop them from de-funding programs that support mothers, such as WIC. But I haven't seen a single post on here about the budget cuts that are hurting mothers. It also seems like this would be a great platform to support domestic violence and rape hotlines and related services. But I haven't seen anything like that on here either. There are real, tangible ways that we can make life easier for mothers, and peaceful ways of lowering abortion rates—by helping mothers be able to afford to have kids (the single biggest reason why they abort). Why isn't actively supporting mothers through defending WIC a major part of the focus of Live Action? If I were you, I would be insisting that Live Action support low income mothers by opposing the cuts to WIC and other programs.

  • paul_macintosh

    I think it's great you're all pro-life and want to ban abortion. But closing down Planned Parenthood is not the way to do this. If you want to rally to ban abortion, please go ahead. But don't close down a service that provides health care to so many millions of women and men.

    • heather carey

      I completely agree. I didn’t see the clip but from the sounds of it he may have gone over board. I feel it is unfair that a “rational” pro life rep can plague the media with facts, but most of the pro choice reps make us sound crazy :/ I don’t think its fair that this host made pro life people sound crazy, but let me tell you, some of them make themselves sound crazy. People need to compromise, make abortion unobtainable to those who use it as birth control but make it something that rape victims can go to if they so desire

  • dezgyrl

    How is the Pence Bill making murder legal? I'm confused.

    I am with the prolife movement 100% except trying to take away WIC. As a mother of two, and one on the way. I'm an avid user of anything free that WIC would like to offer me. I also recommend it to other low income families as myself. We NEED WIC, Birthchoice, The Infant Crisis Center, and Outreach Centers. Without them, our babies, and families would go hungry. Diaperless. Would run around bare because they give out free/extremely affordable clothes. The outreach center I go to even sells HANDMADE, 100% cotton, about an inch thick quilts for $3. Where are you going to find that?

    But in the end I cannot support murder when it comes to PP. If they didn't specialize in abortion. I would utilize their facilities, and even recommend them.

    • livewell8

      No pro-life groups including Live Action, AUL, Students for Life, all the main ones, etc support WIC reduction.

      • Alexa

        Hi livewell,

        That’s great news. I would love to see proof that these groups are supporting the programs that help give these kids a chance at life. Let’s make sure that we’re saving lives both inside and outside the womb.

  • Adrrya

    Come on, this is the Daily Show. Of course they are going to approach this situation like they did. They never really "look soberly at both sides." You can't really expect the cause you are fighting for to gain more attention than all the other newsworthy events out there.

  • Pingback: Hooray for Hollywood

  • Pingback: Pro-PP Comedy Show Sparks Protester Showdown

  • Fed Up With All the Lies

    Boy This guy Paul must be employed by PP or incredibly naive – he swallowed every drop of PP propaganda whole, and added in a few new lies – Like pro-lifers trying to defund WIC (women infants and children). I’ve never heard THAT tale before. But come to think of it, it’s not a new lie. It’s just  a spin on the old favorite lie that pro-lifers don’t care about the baby after he or she is born. Anyone spouting this lie has NEVER met a real pro-life person, much less bothered to get to know them and all the hard work they do to support families and their babies.

    Prolifers are the true champions of women. Why? Because of the simple FACT that MORE WOMEN DIE FROM ABORTIONS than from full term pregnancy, especially in the US with our modern health care. And even if they do not die from the barbaric procedure, abortion does more damage to a woman’s body and mental health than a natural, full term pregnancy. I know many a pro-life doctor who has tried desperately to save the life, or repair the physical and emotional damage done by abortion “doctors.” Planned Parenthood doesn’t offer any “care” except to help women degrade themselves and murder their babies. Period. If they offer anything else, it is to draw in future clients for their murder business, from which the MAJORITY of their INCOME comes from.

    When someone doesn’t care about a woman’s dignity and health, they encourage her to degrade herself by giving it away to any loser who doesn’t care about her and then get an abortion. And that’s what PP does with their poison pills and lies. And they CERTAINLY don’t protect her from being dumped by user SOBs who say, “well if she gets pregnant she can go get an abortion, but don’t expect me the pig boyfriend to pay for it! Let the govt pay for it (ie everyone else)” Never mind protect her from pimps and child molesters and incestuous relatives who use abortion to cover up their crimes. PP encourages this – it’s repeat business for them!

    A person with a pro-abort attitude just wants what’s in it for them, and to throw away the woman or her baby – or both. After all, if they have no problem with murdering an innocent baby – and not just any baby, but THEIR OWN BABY whom they played a part in making – then what is it to them to  steal a woman’s dignity and health?  You got it, zilch

    The lie that pro-lifers don’t care about babies after they’re born is a lie as old as “Republicans” “forcing” women to have babies (which was preached rabidly by wild-eyed feminazis at my ultra liberal college back in 1980s and still is now, so don’t think you parroting it like a good little bot makes it an original thought).

    Who “forced” the woman to have a baby? Are you saying “pro-lifers or “Republicans” raped these
    women?

    Because you do know, don’t you, that the only way to have a baby is to have sex. Period. There is no way to get pregnant without sex. (well there is just ONE other way, but it happened only once in human history and besides, Pro aborts don’t believe in virgin birth anyway. Oh, and THAT birth didn’t occur without FULL CONSENT, a concept pro-aborts don’t get especially the ones working for PP and other abortuaries)

    Whoever told you sex doesn’t lead to babies is a big LIAR and if you believe that you can have sex without ever getting pregnant, then you are a fool for buying that lie.

    If someone indeed forced the woman to have sex and therefore a baby If anyone should be punished in a rape case, it should be the rapist, not the baby.

    If there is anyone out there who thinks like this “paul” (probably not a real person but a PP employee or an abortion doctor) know that the real pro-lifers are praying for your physical and spiritual sake that the scales fall from your eyes and you see the TRUTH about abortion and repent with a full heart before your turn comes on Judgment Day. Heaven is far more wonderful than anything you can dream of, and hell is far far worse than any evil done here. Don’t go there.

  • Fed Up With All the Lies

    Really, if you truly care about women who get abortions, you shouldn’t be working FOR or WITH Planned Parenthood. You should work with a group that helps women heal from abortion or with a crisis pregnancy center to help these women get TRUE care and help for their sad situation. Just because the GOVERNMENT isn’t standing there with a handout, doesn’t mean that people don’t care about them or their families. The government isn’t the best way to help. If 9/11 taught us anything, PEOPLE TO PEOPLE is where the real help is. Find a charity, church or free/charity care medical clinic. Doctors are fed up with the way insurance companies and the govt have interefered in patient care. They have gone back to the “old” model of donating their time and services which worked very well then and does so now. They are out there if you bother to look…unless of course you are really devoted to the idea that the world is better off without some people in it. (which, by the way true pro-lifers don’t believe – they believe ALL persons are precious in God’s eyes. Hence the prayers for your salvation and liberation in the Truth. Remember, anyone threatening you is your standard run of the mill nut job, NOT a pro-lifer and DEFINITELY not a Christian, no matter what else they say. “Thou shall not kill” has no qualifiers as to who we are what we do or when we are in our life cycle). And do yourself a big favor, stop getting your news from the Daily Show.

  • Pingback: Your daily awesome: Court says Texas can defund Planned Parenthood!