Fetus Facepalm

The War on Women’s war on words claims an unexpected victim

Fetus FacepalmDissecting feminazi thought can be a draining, thankless job, considering that it entails grappling with some of the darkest aspects of human nature. But nestled among the freakish rationalizations for killing babies can be found occasional sources of entertainment, my favorite of which is when their ideological hang-ups lead them to turn on each other.

Such is the case with Robyn Swirling’s latest post at RH Reality Check, which identifies the War on Women’s latest offender – Barack Obama:

In the last four years, President Obama has done some great things for women: the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, expansion of women’s health services under the Affordable Care Act, support for Planned Parenthood. And I was happy last night, in his State of the Union address, to hear him push for Congress to vote on the Violence Against Women Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act.

Live Action regulars are well-versed in the ways ObamaCare and Planned Parenthood aren’t “great things for women” at all, and the Ledbetter Act, VAWA, and paycheck fairness are similar concoctions, meant not as solutions to real injustices but as weapons with which to malign Republicans as sexist – as helpfully demonstrated by Swirling’s condemnation of Republican lawmakers Cathy McMorris Rodgers and Virginia Foxx as “traitors to their sex.”

But I digress. What slight could possibly anger the feminist gods enough to negate such a generous offering?

But I was disheartened by his reasoning for why Congress should do these things: “We know our economy is stronger when our wives, mothers, and daughters can live their lives free from discrimination in the workplace, and free from the fear of domestic violence.” [Emphasis mine.]

My worth as a woman, and as a person, is not imbued by my relationship to someone else. I should not be granted rights and protections because I am somebody’s wife, mother, daughter, or sister. I deserve those rights and protections by virtue of my status as a person and as an American citizen.

Oh, the horror.

After running down a few more examples of Obama calling women, uh, wives, mothers, and daughters, Swirling argues:

Boys and men are frequently implored to think of abstract women in relation to themselves – what if she, the woman you’re harassing or thinking of raping, was your sister, your girlfriend, your mother? How would you feel if someone did that to her?

Well I am someone’s sister, someone’s girlfriend, someone’s daughter. But I don’t think that I should be able to walk down the street without being cat-called or followed or assaulted because someone suddenly realizes that I could be their sister, their girlfriend, their mother. I should have the right and the freedom to walk down the street unmolested because I am a person. Because I am a woman who should have all the same rights and bodily autonomy as that man who yells as I pass that he wants to touch my breasts and then calls me a bitch and follows me home when I have the gall to ignore him or call him out on his misogyny.

Show of hands: how many pro-choicers can say with a straight face that they would honestly read that much into Obama’s phrasing? How many truly believe that Obama (or his speechwriter) intended to convey, or the average listener would conclude, that women have worth only through their relationships to men?

Odds are that most pro-choicers are rolling their eyes at Swirling’s nitpicking, and some might even feel embarrassed. Here’s the thing, though: she’s merely taking the War on Women’s standard demagoguery and applying it more consistently. Lefties who think she’s giving Obama a bad rap have only developed an appreciation for rhetorical common sense and charity because theirs is the ox being gored.

Her twisting of Obama’s words is no worse than what the left subjects pro-lifers to every day (which Obama himself is all too happy to benefit from). Here’s a partial list of the most popular subliminal messages pro-aborts have divined from pro-life speech:

  • “Babies have a right to be born” became “women don’t exist” and “women are just incubators.”
  • “Sex has consequences” became “women deserve punishment for having sex.”
  • “People should exercise personal responsibility” became “women shouldn’t have sex lives.”
  • “Life is a gift from God” became “God wants women to get raped.”
  • “Abortion is murder” became “let’s throw women in jail.”
  • “Pro-life laws should punish abortionists rather than pregnant women” became “we don’t really think abortion is murder.”
  • “I disagree with liberal feminists” became “let’s silence women and have men dominate the country.”

It would be nice if the occasional taste of their own medicine instilled in pro-choicers some appreciation of intellectual honesty and willingness to stick to debating the things pro-lifers actually say. But it’ll never happen. So we’ll just have to enjoy the sideshow and hope the inanity of the infighting jars a few of their more moderate followers to their senses.

  • ldwendy

    Calvin,

    I don’t see any problems with how liberals interpret the first three statements.

    “Babies have a right to be born” became “women don’t exist” and “women are just incubators.”
    – As long as zygotes and beyond are given “inalienable” rights that supersedes the right of a fully grown woman to DECIDE FOR HERSELF whether she wishes to remain pregnant, of course the logical conclusion is that the forced-birth people like you see women as incubators and not much more. Of course, conservative Christians like to romanticize pregnancy and motherhood as the greatest blessings that God can give a woman, but the truth is, not all women want to be pregnant or be a mother.

    “Sex has consequences” became “women deserve punishment for having sex.” – Forced-birth folks like to think women deserve punishment for having sex outside of marriage. That is a true statement. There is no twisting of words here.

    “People should exercise personal responsibility” became “women shouldn’t have sex lives.” : To be more precise: Single women shouldn’t have sex lives. That is also another common viewpoint by conservative folks like you. Liberals did not twist that statement.

    • Basset_Hound

      There are MANY logical flaws in your interpretation of Calvin’s post…

      1. A fully grown woman has every right to DECIDE FOR HERSELF whether or not she has sex. NO ONE is forcing women to report to insemination centers. The VAST majority of pregnancies occur from CONSENSUAL sex.

      2. One of the consequences of sex is pregnancy. Once a pregnancy occurs, there are TWO separate individuals who must be considered. A person’s right to live does NOT depend on his or her size, age, environment or level of development. A woman has no more right to kill an unborn child for her own convenience than she has to kill a newborn child for her own convenience.

      “Sex has consequences” became “women deserve punishment for having sex.” – Forced-birth folks like to think women deserve punishment for having sex outside of marriage. That is a true statement. There is no twisting of words here.”

      WRONG…WRONG…WRONG…. There are SERIOUS repurcussions associated with uncommitted casual sex, that do not involve pregnancy. Sexually transmitted diseases and emotional damage aren’t punishment,they are consequences of poor choices. You are indeed twisting words here.

      3. People SHOULD exercise personal responsibility. Single women should take into account their economic circumstances, their relationship circumstances and weigh the decision to have sex in terms of long term effects the decision will have in their lives AND the lives of those who will be affected by the decision. There are volumes of studies that demonstrate the social and economic disadvantages faced by children raised in single parent households.

      YOU are the one guilty of reducing women to nothing more than sex toys.

      • Calvin Freiburger

        Whew. Thanks for dealing with that insanity so I didn’t have to :)

    • http://www.facebook.com/samandwest Sam Cavanaugh

      Your assertions are much more degrading to women than anything Calvin said.

    • JDC

      I don’t think I have ever seen a reasonable comment non-ironically use the phrase “forced-birth”. Just saying.

  • Hannah Mallery

    Her article is proof positive that, no matter how much support they get, feminists will always find something to b!tch about.

  • http://twitter.com/Astraspider Astraspider

    That you have to go to this far down the pecking order of writers to find a relatively minor disagreement on the Left says more about the relative hegemony on the Left than anything else, Calvin. Maybe you’re just jealous of said hegemony, given that Republican schisms are a daily topic of conversation on my teevee (ie: Rove v. FreedomWorks; Scarborough v. Breitbart; Sen. Rubio’s official response to SOTU v. Sen. Paul’s pseudo-official response; Sen. Cruz v. Sen. McCain; the few Republicans who want more than 27% of the Hispanic vote v. Republicans … I could go on and on).

    • Calvin Freiburger

      And Astraspider somehow manages to out-ridiculous herself. I don’t know how your thought process could conclude (a) that I’m jealous of apparent liberal hegemony (to the contrary, liberals are sheep so I expect you to be herdable), or (b) that I was trying to present this story as some sort of broader left-wing schism — especially considering how my point was predicated on my assumption that most liberals WOULD recognize Swirling as a nut.

      Seriously, Astra. My own words. Right in what you’re responding to. Aren’t you just a teensy bit concerned about why this sort of thing keeps happening?

      • http://twitter.com/Astraspider Astraspider

        Like clockwork, you insist to have some internal logic to your piece that your critics are missing. Says more about your craftsmanship than your critics, this one critic thinks.

        • Calvin Freiburger

          Um, wow.

          Do you really not understand what a fool you’re making of yourself?

          • http://twitter.com/Astraspider Astraspider

            If I only listened to your invective, maybe that’d be something I “understand”, because it’s really the only thing on offer from you these days.

          • Calvin Freiburger

            Thanks. This entire comment thread is the definitive indictment of your problems with logical communication. Rest assured, you are the only one for whom there’ some mystery as to what I’ve said, or why your “response” fails so spectacularly.