Opinion

What I like about Jamie – my thoughts on TIME Magazine’s controversial mom

Jamie Lynne Grumet gained public exposure from the cover of TIME Magazine’s May 21, 2012 issue. Jamie was pictured breastfeeding her 3-year-old son Aram while he stood on a chair next to her. The picture was combined with the taunting title, “Are you Mom enough?” The Time cover lead to a great deal of controversy for the California mom and fellow supporters of attachment parenting. Some people applauded Jamie, thanking her for stirring up the discussion on breastfeeding past infancy. Others found her picture to be disturbing and exploitative. Moms throughout the country voiced their offense at TIME Magazine for a title they felt divided women and caused competition between parenting styles. One of the most common words used by men and women to describe Jamie’s picture was “disgusting.”

I came across Jamie’s blog, “I am not the babysitter,” weeks ago and found her thoughts on parenting enlightening and informative. It’s unfortunate that TIME Magazine shared them in an inconsiderate way. They took a less startling picture of Jamie cradling her son in her arms while breastfeeding, but that one didn’t make the cover. During a radio interview Jamie admitted the cover pic was a candid shot, taken between staged photos. She said although the shot looks posed, it was actually caught as she was changing positions between takes. Jamie was surprised to see the cover and cringed when she read the title. Her friends describe her as a non-judgmental person who would never seek to use media fame to hurt her child or pit mothers against each other.

In the midst of the anger surrounding the sensational cover, it’s easy to dismiss Jamie and her message. This is a shame because she  has great things to say. She brings to light attachment parenting principles such as extended breastfeeding, co-sleeping, and carrying your child in a sling, which are all normal things practiced across the globe.

Katherine Dettwyler, an anthropology professor at the University of Delaware, dismissed labels like “perverted” and “disgusting” when it comes to attachment parenting. She said, “It’s normal for our species. It’s not perverted, it’s not sex, it’s not women doing it for some perverse need. It’s normal like a nine-month pregnancy is normal.” Dettwyler’s published studies on breastfeeding show that most children around the world are breast-fed for three to five years or longer.

Here is a simple definition of attachment parenting:

Attachment parenting focuses on the nurturing connection that parents can develop with their children. That nurturing connection is viewed as the ideal way to raise secure, independent, and empathetic children. Proponents of this parenting philosophy include the well-known pediatrician William Sears, MD. They make the case that a secure, trusting attachment to parents during childhood form the basis for secure relationships and independence as adults.

One of the most interesting things Jamie Lynne supports is “Adoptive Breastfeeding.” I was very surprised when I saw a picture of her breastfeeding her adopted Ethiopian son, Samuel.

She wrote on her blog:

[N]ot only was my child taken away from his homeland, culture, language, and family (most importantly, his mother) – He was also stripped of the one action that provided him comfort.

Being able to breastfeed Samuel for almost a year was a beautiful experience. [...]

When I asked him if he would also like to breastfeed he smiled and jumped right on my lap. Our first experience breastfeeding you could tell he was an old pro. It was clear it was something he missed dearly. Something from home I was able to give him.

I’m so happy I was able was able to provide him with the comfort he needed to get through trauma. Trauma most people will never experience in their entire life.

Adoptive breastfeeding is normal in many parts of Ethiopia. Wet nurses are popular and common. Jamie shares that adoptive breastfeeding made it easier for her son to bond, and it also helped her biological child Aram understand that his brother Samuel was a completely equal member of the family.

Jamie’s compassion for children reaches beyond her own family. She is the founder of the Fayye Foundation, a nonprofit organization reaching the poor in Africa.

The Fayye Foundation is dedicated to addressing the orphan crisis in the Sidama region of Ethiopia. The people of Sidama suffer from high HIV/AIDS rates, lack of basic health care (which influences high maternal mortality rates), famine, and financial lack for widows and orphans. Jamie and her friends created the Faye foundation to help meet these needs. They provide support to at risk families through clinics that offer medication and prenatal care. They also offer micro-loans that provide income for widows to keep their families intact.

Jamie is a mother who loves Jesus, nurtures her sons, cares for her husband, and fights for orphans and widows. That combination can be hard to come by these days. The TIME cover gave her instant fame, but I hope she’ll be remembered for more than that in the years to come. After the controversy subsides, and the conversations cease, Jamie will still be a mom who is there for her kids. For that, I commend her.

Live Action on Facebook
  • Faith

    I wasn’t too shocked by the cover; more by the comments and speculation about the picture.  To be honest, I was so glad about the controversial cover after I read about Christy Turlington and friends anti-Mother’s Day– I would much rather people be distracted by an attractive breastfeeding mother than focus on the pro-choice propaganda.  Thanks for the great article!!

  • Jamie

    Christina! I am so moved by your words! Thank you so much.

    I would like to clear up what I had said about repositioning. The shoot was not going for the look the cover ultimately selected. Standing up on the stool was playful an nuturing- We’ve breastfed standing up at home. What happened was he dropped his arms on a few occasions which the lovely photographer and TIME staff were vocal they did not want. He is 3 and was moving around, but the detached look of the shot was something that the shoot (which I find no pressure and very relaxed enviornment) was not attempting to do. When doing a shoot like this all the families know there is a risk involved because you allow even the outtakes to be used. We knew that and I do not blame TIME, but I personally would not choose that image, and I especially would not put a headline pitting moms against each other. It goes against what I believe in. We need to encourage any healthy choice a family makes- whether that be bottle feeding or breastfeeding past infancy. It is about helping empower the mother and father to make the best choice for their own family. I hope TIME has sparked the dialogue and we can all come together (men and women) and really learn about empathy and compassion from this. Even if this is not an ideal situation I do believe good with come. And for being brave enough to put a breastfeeding mother on the cover I do commend TIME for.

    • Christina Marie Martin

      Jamie!

      I’m so happy you read it. That encouraged me so much! I’ve wanted to tell you that I was really touched by your post on Trayvon Martin. That was one of the first things that drew me to your blog. There was just so much awful stuff I read online concerning the case and I was really saddened by it all. Especially as an African-American woman. I just felt hopeless. Your post with the pics of your boys, black and white together, was so encouraging. It reminded me that this is how God wants us to be, like little children who don’t see differences. The pic of you breastfeeding Samuel really blew me away. Especially because I knew you must have gotten racist comments about that pic. For me, it was healing because I saw that you were someone who loves outside of color differences. I’ve researched adoption and I know that many parent’s won’t adopt out of their race for various reasons. I was moved that you didn’t care about that, you just wanted to love a child. So, when the TIME cover came out I thought “That’s the lady from the blog!” I was hurt by all the negative comments I saw directed towards you. I wanted to write something from my heart. Thanks for clearing things up about the positioning. I got that part from what I heard on the radio interview. I appreciate you giving me the details. It’s awesome that you have a good perspective on it all and are so honoring to Time magazine. Your right, good will come from this situation. I’m sure there’s a lot of good already happening that we might not know about. Thanks for your courage, stand for God, children, justice for the poor in the nations. You are a voice and God is doing great things through you! :) 

    • Elise77

       Hi Jamie, thanks for the insight into that photo. Knowing the background, I would be upset with TIME Magazine if I were in your place, because I felt the photo was a little exploitative. I am a HUGE advocate of breastfeeding, my kids all basically self-weaned, and my own son weaned when he was two. I don’t find it terribly shocking that you breastfeed your three year old, and I think it’s particularly wonderful that you were able to nurture your adopted son that way. I don’t like the way our society has made the breast so taboo, and I think that efforts to de-stigmatize breastfeeding (even/especially in public) are worthwhile, but honestly, I think the effect of that particular photo was kind of a setback to that cause. I’d like to be wrong, though… :) Having breastfeeding “shoved in their faces” is what people seem to find objectionable, and the apparent message of the photo was “in-your-face” even exclusive of the headline. So I’m glad and grateful to hear your side of the story, and I very much respect your point of view. A lot of people misjudged you based on that cover, myself included, and I’d like to apologize for that.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Heather-Harrison/1604165346 Heather Harrison

    Do you think it’s possible that we could spend just as much
    time and energy warring about the real problems that negatively affect
    children? What about the kids who are sold for drugs or living on the streets?
    What about all of the children that go to bed hungry and starving every night
    or scared of the abuse they know will be coming after they fall asleep? Can we
    just take a moment and focus on some of the real parenting problems that exist
    and are worthy of our attention? I have a perspective shift here:

    http://www.themommypsychologist.com/2012/05/08/what-are-the-real-parenting-problems/

    • Checkit

      Are you not the same person who calls AP a form of abuse? Oh yeah, you are. Not fooling me with your self promotion and claims of some higher moral standard.

  • Julia Anderson

    SO nice to know more about Jamie. 

    Thanks for the comments below as well, Christina and Jamie.

    LOVING the children brings glory to our Blessed Jesus. He is pleased when mamas sacrifice for them, spending time and giving to them w/out any expectations in return.

    May our culture be one to stand up for the value and worth of every single precious baby/child.  We need to again find MOTHERHOOD to be the very heart of the nation.

  • Stellamom02

    Everyone is quick to judge, I try my best not to judge others parenting as I know well that I am far from perfect. I am Glad you are positively promoting attached parenting, I never knew that I was practicing this until I started looking into it more and realized that all those things seemed natural to me. I have 4 children and I never let them cry it out and always let sleep with us if they wanted to, I never knew that this wasn’t what we were “suppose to be doing” I think parents should do what feels natural to them.

  • http://eastcoastgirl.us/ Erma

    Really great article Christina! A lot of people have voiced their opinions on the cover photo alone and haven’t taken the time to find out who Jamie is, what she does, and everything she’s passionate about as a mother.

  • mamazee73

    That is so cool! Thank you for information about Fayye Foundation – we have been looking for a charity that aims to keep families intact instead of adopting out children who have parents who feel they have no other choice. True orphans need forever families, but many children are adopted away from their families due to poverty, and as a Christian i would far rather help parents keep their little ones….

  • Mello2342

    I honestly don’t think she did anything “disgusting” or perverted” at all. and it upsets me that people will call the picture of her nursing her son that, but those same people probably wouldn’t care if a half naked woman was posed on a cover of a magazine in a provocative way. that is disgusting, not this.

  • Jordan Elizabeth

    Aw, I love this article :) Especially the adoptive breastfeeding thing.

  • Guest

    I breastfed both of my boys until they self-weaned, each 3 months before their third birthdays.  My older son jumped down from my lap one day, said “that’s enough!” – and it was; he never asked again.  They are teens now and have no recollection of any of it but I have lovely memories of cuddling together and giving them a great start.

  • Anna

    how can they think that this is disgusting and abortion is not?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=643766373 LeRoy Whitman

    I appreciate your view. Not sure why some find it “disgusting” to nurse a 3 year old. (Only in America!) Moses’ and Samuel’s moms, Jochebed and Hannah, surely nursed them until 3 or 4 or more, since they had to part with them when they were weaned. This is not unusual in other parts of the world. Besides, does anyone remember what a female breast is for? It’s for feeding children!, and in the most healthful and nutritive way possible. Studies show that breastfeeding is helpful to the mom as well … as well, that is, to the long term health of the person breastfed for at least a year. We also used attachment parenting, on this basis: God answers us before we cry, and treats the young (not yet mature) believer in His family with special care and assurance of His love before teaching the lessons about self-denial, which come AFTER one experientially knows and is assured of the Father’s love.